This is a social media website and not a scientific journal. Here is a veteran of long term study of biological threats against humanity, maybe he can convince you. The entire internet is at your disposal, prove it to yourself. No one bears responsibility for convincing anyone else.
https://blog.bulletproof.com/don-huber-318/
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
This is true. To publish your often poorly compensated and year-long, painstaking research in a scientific journal of any decent reputation you need to pay money and pass the scrutiny of 2-4 peer reviewers.
It doesn't cost you anything to publish an article on this social media website except for the time you spent on writing and researching it, but you can potentially earn (lots of) money! This why it is especially important that these articles are carefully curated by the community. If the content appears to have little credibility, then it is the duty of the community to address this. Misinformation on social media is as bad as is censorship, in my opinion. I'd prefer to not have either of them.
Your answer is generic, since nowadays you can just give "the internet" as a source for everything, even for almost any hogwash you can come up with because most certainly someone expressed his or her thoughts just because they can on the internet.
Thanks you for the link though, I will read into it.