Notice
The following proposal is a merger of three proposals: Grow The Chain, S+ Foundation, and Stars Align. The team (in alphabetical order) that collaborated on this proposal is: @aggroed, @bluefinstudios, @guiltyparties, @upheaver, and @whatsup. With input from the current and active working group members, @eonwarped, @llfarms and @shadowspub.
Overview
The goal of this proposal is to combine some of the best ideas put forward and work alongside Steemit Inc to build the most beneficial Community Foundation possible, through collaboration.
Roadmap
The first step would be to meet with Steemit Inc. We believe discussing the ideas as well as reaching out for professional guidance on the legalities involved in building a Foundation is vital. There are many contacts, ideas and knowledge they can offer in this process and the first step would be to discuss what is viable so we can then move forward to make it happen.
This proposal team will form the interim board with some volunteers from WGs, large communities, dapps, and other submitted proposals. Their first order of business is to get a system of voting into place for board positions.
Next, the group would need to formulate detailed role descriptions and get qualified individuals. Community feedback will be vital in this stage and, as explained in the structures section, many of these would be filled through an election.
The ongoing goal is to not only be self-sustaining, but also grow the holdings of the Foundation in order to provide greater value, year over year, to the Steem Blockchain.
Mission
The Foundation will champion the Steem ecosystem, focusing on its adoption, retention, public relations, and development.
Vision
The Foundation will be where community members, investors, developers, and influencers come together to advance the Steem ecosystem and underlying technology.
Values
Our values respect the diverse groups and individuals that make up the Steem ecosystem.
- community
- accountability
- inclusiveness
- leadership
Goals
Encourage and offer support to projects that increase the value of the Steem token and enhance the user experience on the Steem Blockchain.
Advance outreach programs to attract new users.
Embrace Steem communities to work towards improving user retention.
Support Open Source development to optimize and improve the functionality and scalability of the Steem blockchain.
Empower investment, marketing, and promotional initiatives.
Stimulate business adoption of Steem.
Collaborate with influential businesses and communities to mainstream Steem.
The Foundation will be flexible and evolve to take on more responsibilities as it grows.
Fiat Legal Structure
Non-profit housed in the USA to allow for funding in the USA.
Structure
Voting Members/Board of Directors (15)
Executive (5)
Chair
Vice Chair
Secretary
Treasurer (Liaison)
Legal (Liaison)
Critical Partners (2)
Corporate Representative (Steemit Inc)
Witness Representative (Technical)
Directors (8)
Board Member 1
Board Member 2
Board Member 3
Board Member 4
Board Member 5
Board Member 6
Board Member 7
Board Member 8
Topical Sub-Boards/Committees
Community Success
Responsibilities
- Develop job descriptions
- Develop vendor selection processes
- Keep all vendor-related records
- Handle in-Foundation disputes
- Process member replacements
- Create and action communications plan
- Develop pieces of communication
Incubator and Delegations
Responsibilities
- Produce quarterly and year-end reports (fund management)
- Retain and catalog all receipts and financial records
- Develop and provide mentorship services
- Develop and implement functional delegation application and selection process
- Keep abreast of relevant legal developments
- Vet all projects for legal implications
Product and Development
Responsibilities
- Quality control of projects
- Produce quarterly and year-end reports of project milestones
- Code review where necessary
- Ensure all development is legitimate and unique
Marketing
Responsibilities
- Create and action marketing plan
- Source vendors for promotional materials
- Oversee all promotions
- Organize conference representation
Investor Relations
Responsibilities
- Develop fundraising plan and goals
- Develop fundraising budget
- Develop sponsorship package
- Establish relationship with donors
- Maintain donor database
- Attract and connect investors with Steem projects
Nomination
All Foundation members should be selected for the nomination process solely based on their skills, competencies and proficiencies. All skills are to be verifiable and self-evident. Self-identification of skills is vital.
Engagement
Foundation members would be required to maintain an active participation rate of 80%, including the attendance of 8/10 meetings, and serve on no less than 2 Topical Sub-Boards each. No member should serve on more than 3 Topical Sub-Boards to prevent both monopoly and burnout.
Remuneration
Board members and volunteers are expected to operate pro-bono without receiving financial compensation in the official capacity. Official compensation includes upvotes, delegation or anything else monetary in nature. That does not mean that expenses accrued for the purposes of service should not be reimbursed.
Community Involvement
The general public has the ability to run a campaign to serve on any of the Topical Sub-Boards. They also have the ability to present requests for funding to the board.
Communication and Meetings
Communication between Foundation members and the general userbase will be facilitated at regular intervals through accessible methods of scheduled public forums.
Communication is built into the role of Secretary for broadcasting, and setting a regular schedule to ensure that community members can be heard.
All communication will be kept professional and free of biases.
Major, public General Meetings, hosted via teleconferencing or at a physical location of the Foundation's choice (with a teleconference option), will be held on a semi-annual basis. No longer than 6 months will pass between meetings.
Content of Meetings
- Reports
- Recognition and project overviews
- Community input
- Relevant metrics
- Membership (voting in)
- Resignations
- Other announcements
- Alterations to Board structure where necessary (ie. adding seats)
Foundation Funding
The startup funding is anticipated to come from Steemit Inc through direct donation or other agreed upon method. Once funding is set up, the goal is to ensure that all the activities supported with funding provide benefits back to the foundation. The foundation will focus on seeking out grants, delegations, equity deals and possibly low interest loans as part of the initial funding to ensure the project is well-funded and sustainable. Additionally, the DAO can be requested for funds and individuals or outside corporations can contribute.
Project Funding
Project funding is central to the purpose of the organization and how it's structured. The Foundation is designed to allow the community to request funding from Topical Sub-Boards for quality projects that will help mainstream Steem.
All funding requests will be called for, accepted and processed in an open and public manner. Favoritism and nepotism will be investigated and addressed. Budgets and final figures are compiled by the Executive Board and approved by the Board of Directors.
Incubators
The purpose of incubators is to support excellent community innovation initiatives and projects. No funding will be distributed based on ideas or mockups that lack feasibility, community support and owner investment.
Accountability
Accounts / Wallets
All Steem accounts owned by the Foundation should be set to @steem as Trustee and monitored for unauthorized advanced changes (ie. vesting route, trustee account, active authority) as well as unauthorized use of third party services. To mitigate inadvertent loss of control, third party services should be avoided unless absolutely necessary. No individual user should ever be set as Trustee for a Foundation account.
Ethics
There are ways to remove bad actors from the various Boards. There are community guidelines included in the structure designed to allow other members to enforce rules and standards. Voting is public and always available. If people act in a manner that constitutes a breach of community trust, the community can unvote them from the role.
Foundation board members found to be engaged in unethical practices will be expected to immediately resign or will be removed from their positions of trust. Rules and procedures will be put in place to allow removal of board members and executive committee members that are not responsive or are acting against the goals and mission of the Foundation.
No board member will attempt to leverage his or her position to gain favor, support or otherwise promotion for any activity outside of the Foundation. The board and body of the Foundation are to remain separate from any and all non-Foundation leadership and governance structures including but not limited to witnessing, major project ownership, community leadership or business ventures. No board member will introduce him or herself as a board member and witness or whatever other role(s) on the platform held.
Witness Bias
Support for individual witnesses should never be implied, directly or indirectly, by any Foundation account or active board member unless said member is a witness themselves and are speaking from a non-Foundation standpoint.
Foundation accounts should not be voting for witnesses or curating content.
Closing Remarks
We envision a future where Steem is everywhere and business rely on the innovation and power of the blockchain. Where strong communities use the ecosystem to build, share and broadcast their message in and beyond their immediate group. Investors will pour money into the ecosystem to capture the best returns possible. And best in class content creators and consumers will gather here. For this, we need a strong and unified Foundation.
Wow, this sounds almost exactly like what @jackmiller proposed already and has been talked about in several exchanges. Brilliant idea!
This proposal is copy/paste of my proposal and the other two. I wrote it myself. No other files were open at the time at it was 3am the day of the due date.
Love late night jam sessions😋looks good tho, really.
Posted using Partiko Android
don't get where you get that from @enginewitty .... the concepts used came from the guys who wrote the three merged proposals.
Oooh, I didn't fully read the three from everyone. Looks good tho!
Posted using Partiko Android
Oh yeah. This is what I've been waiting for. Nicely done, I think this is it!
Thanks Shadow and all the other members for your work and dedication. I believe this thing is going to fly!
Awesome! I collaborated a lot on Stars Align with @aggroed and I'd love to be involved in this one as well, let me know! You can find me on discord under petertag
Posted using Partiko Android
Well the major issue is attracting investors/new players and making them stay. A community driven project like this will go a long way in achieving that
I am hugely in favour of a collaboration.
Does this mean that board members, unless witnesses themselves, cannot vote for other witnesses? I think having a witness vote for someone is quite a strong and direct implication that you are in support of them :)
individuals can vote for who ever they want.
No vote representing the organization is to be made.
That maybe should be worded clearer.
The additional sentence clarifies what the account will be doing in not voting for witnesses.
I'm still stuck on:
Why do they have to be a witness themselves?
e.g. Any board member can speak positively or negatively (by votes or text) towards a witness as long as they aren't using the foundation account?
Good luck on this! :D
As long as they are not using a foundation account OR representing themselves as being part of it.
That is pretty standard in any organization I've been part of leadership with, when speaking on a matter there has to be clarity if speaking personally or as part of the group leadership.
Yes I understand, just wanted it to be clear in the text so that it's simple and there can be no doubt :)
!ENGAGE 50
Here are your
ENGAGEtokens!To view or trade
ENGAGEgo to steem-engine.com.It means board members can't go around campaigning for witness votes based on their service on the board.
I mean, you could potentially glean that from the text, but why not just add something close to what you have written as a point. Make it clear :D
I'll clear it up if the proposal gets voted in. I don't think I can edit it right now. All the entire bottom regarding ethics is supposed to do is make sure people can't game the foundation. They should care about the community and ecosystem, not about their own interests. Hopefully it'll simply repel those out for a quick buck.
Understood. Less game, more honest action :)
!ENGAGE 50
Here are your
ENGAGEtokens!To view or trade
ENGAGEgo to steem-engine.com.Hi, @shadowspub!
You just got a 0.21% upvote from SteemPlus!
To get higher upvotes, earn more SteemPlus Points (SPP). On your Steemit wallet, check your SPP balance and click on "How to earn SPP?" to find out all the ways to earn.
If you're not using SteemPlus yet, please check our last posts in here to see the many ways in which SteemPlus can improve your Steem experience on Steemit and Busy.
I wonder about board members being unpaid. If they end up having to do a lot of work, this will be a barrier to do it for people without free time. Also, it seems to concentrate a lot of power in America and for whales.
The reason is to remove anyone who isn't in it to help support the steem community but is only there for money. Money corrupts. The board will take the same amount of time as any other volunteering.
In my experience, I have over 40 years of involvement with community volunteering, the only true barrier to anyone volunteering their time and talents is their own sense of willingness to give.
Don't get your comment about concentrating power in America.. I'm not in America nor are some others who are currently involved. The legal entity based in America is not a barrier to anyone else internationally to become involved. I'm also not a whale, nor are others involved.
Yes, the voting will likely involve some form of stake based voting. This is a stake based platform, that's a fact of life. The exact form of that voting will be sorted out after the community speaks on which proposal will be the base for the future structure.
It makes good sense what you say about volunteering. However I just look at the best talent in the world for some positions. Very talented CEOs don't come cheap. Imagine what a celebrity CEO could do for Steem?
The American concentrated part is just because the foundation happens to be there. Actually if you read another proposal, it specifically says it will not be in america. Personally I like America for both a location of the foundation and just a great place in general. But we have to consider some people don't like america and would rather a foundation be in a neutral country.
Posted using Partiko Android
At some future point, when the foundation is a rocking success, the board may choose to allow remuneration in order to attract some celebrity CEO. That would be a long way off in the future and definitely NOT in the startup phase that we're going to be in.
Yes, I know some of the proposals are not in favour of the legal entity being US based. They will have some hurdles to deal with when it comes to the major funding coming from the US, but that will be their wall to climb. :)
The reason here was pragmatic, major initial funding coming from the US, then establish the legal entity there to line up with legal requirements.
Hi @shadowspub!
Your post was upvoted by @steem-ua, new Steem dApp, using UserAuthority for algorithmic post curation!
Your UA account score is currently 6.088 which ranks you at #294 across all Steem accounts.
Your rank has not changed in the last three days.
In our last Algorithmic Curation Round, consisting of 208 contributions, your post is ranked at #2. Congratulations!
Evaluation of your UA score:
Feel free to join our @steem-ua Discord server