That the baker's right to choose "what they would or would not do" was ever in question was beyond my belief.
It was so ludicrous that i was sure that this was a ploy to make out gay people as horrific villains. (probably by some guys pretending to be gay) And thus provoke the christian-right to get up in arms.
I am glad that the supreme court ruled so. That it was 7-2, and not 9-0 is beyond my belief. Forcing someone to do something they do not want to do is slavery. And if there is no eminent physical danger from their inaction, then there should be no challenge to their rights.