Would you explian to me how returning the rights to individuals does any of what you talked about. Again, in the video Adam talks about first dissolving the federal government, then the states, when things are in the community level things are voluntary or you can pull back to your own propoerty. Thank you soo much for allowing me to show others how brilliant and easily defended these things are. Unlike you, it is not required of me to attack. I can stay true to th NAP. We simply have different opinions. Again though what was your plan again? Or are you still just attacking without any real plan of your own? Many people like to critisize others while doing nothing themselves. I really would love to hear how you plan on acheiving your goals. Or are you just shouting down those who are taking action and offering no real alternative?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I hope this is a joke. This is so evasive.
His platform says that national parks will be preserved as non-profits “open to the public.”
This will be centrally decided (which non-profits get the land) by himself and his “custodians,” correct?
How would you solve the problem? You keep ignoring this simple question. I get it, you do not agree with Adam's plan. He has one, it seems to me all you can do is criticize. Can you constructively give everyone your plan?
Like I said, you are committing a logical fallacy. Whether or not I have a “plan” to save the masses is irrelevant to the fact that Adam’s plan is immoral.
Am I not allowed to say that minimal slavery is still slavery, and wrong, without an idea as to how to end it, or is it still wrong?
See what I mean?
I do have a plan though. The thing is, voluntaryism is about individuals, and one man’s one plan isn’t going to save the world. It’s already happening. Look around steemit. Family protection organizations are being formed, ghost computers are being built, the poor, homeless and hungry are being helped, sheltered, and fed.
Is this not enough of a “plan” for you? Or is the leveraging of the intrinsically violent political system necessary to bring about change.
Much respect man.
All I am trying to say is that we are on the same side, I understand you disagree, you do you. I disagree as I said with Rand but what if he can do something good for the world, why should I not appreciate that. Adam is commited to the cause of Freedom and I think that his plan is the best I have ever seen to getting us to a Volentaryist society.
His plan is not voluntaryist, by defintion. I don’t even understand how you guys think this is debatable.