Adam Kokesh if you become President you will immediately be approached by Pentagon and Cia people who want you to continue their operations in the middle east, there will be massive pressure on you to continue these programms.
Cia & Pentagon " President Kokesh we have been conducting spec ops in Syria from the start, we have invested many millions and we have invested blood, we want that oil and we want hedgemony. We need you to sign off on our operations for clarity. Please sign here, here and here"
How do you respond?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
The more important question is considering the number of homeless and low income humans unable to afford health insurance and a pension provision.....when all 50million ask for help after the Libertarian party have dismantled the welfare state as per their manifesto is...
How do you respond?
The states will stop sending money to DC to siphon money off the top. This will equal more money for local communities. Government does not have any money that they did not rob at gunpoint from someone.
how does it equal more money for local communities ? the states wont be getting any money as there will be no taxes lol...whatever they get will come from voluntary contribution....from people who voted them in because they didnt want to pay any form of taxes....Do you think people will pay voluntarily as expected or pay nothing? In which case I ask again, who is going to help? what about roads , infrastructure etc etc...Its like the party a spoilt child would invent ! Have you actually read the Libertarian manifesto ?
Finally, perhaps governments rob money off people because they at least understand the need to help those less fortunate and the need in a modern humanitarian world for some form of welfare state to help the less fortunate as they know if they didn't, no one would give voluntarily........
Of course, fuck those poor and ill folk as long as you have the right to bear arms and revert the country back to civil war.
Government extorts money from people through taxation, it does not have money itself. For every step that dollar takes it is stolen from more. I will give an example. If the government steals a dollar from you to give it to your neighbor as food stamps, it is taken from you against your consent by someone in your local government. They are working for $, so their cut, let's say is 5 cents. 1.00-.05=.95 They hand it off to county government .95-.05=.90 To your state .90-.10= .80 to your regional people .80-.05= .75 Finally, it is off to the Federal government to process and take their cut and return .75-.25= .50 Now it is time for the government to be generous with your money. They send it back to the region .50-.05= .45 the State .45-.10=.35 county .35-.05=.30 and finally your local government .30-.05=.25 gives your neighbor .25 $ in food stamps. How is it more money for local governments? I would go next door and give my neighbor a meal= $15.00, but if you have local government handling it, sure they will have to do more but it would be closer to this stolen $1.00-.25=.75, given to your neighbor. Does that help?
So yes MUH ROADS! will get taken care of as well and use above formula to calculate. Just as an aside my government roads are horrible here in Indiana, are yours better?
Absolutely I help the poor, I recently was involved in a drive to clothe local homeless people. I also donate to my local food bank, which my wife volunteers at. As for guns, yes obviously I support people having the right to their own property but what does that have to do with the current question?
The US really doesn't want their oil they just don't want anyone else having it. The US just announced the other day it will become the largest distributor of oil on the market therefore we have plenty. Whoever has control of the oil in the ME becomes the dominate player and if that player happens to be terrorist then it's in the wrong hands because it's the oil that enables them to finance weapons. In Syria the US currently holds the most valuable real estate, land that oil fields are on, so until the situation there works itself out somehow whereas the government stabilizes I don't see them pulling out anytime soon.
Think about the audacity of that, the US openly admits to holding land of a foreign nation against the explicit wishes of that country. And to add to it you are also arming the jihadists in Syria. You call them rebels because you know a western public would never understand how the US could arm the same minded people like the 911 hijackers, jihadists types. Also arming jihadists at this moment would constitute treason as they are undoubtedly the enemy. So calling them rebels is an intentional mislabelling aka verbal gymnastics eg like calling torture enhanced interrogation.
I call the rebels because Assad has labeled them rebels. Rebels against his rule would be my guess as to why he's gone to calling them that. Then there's the Kurds who Turkey has labeled as terrorist and US as part of their coalition fighting ISIS terrorist. I don't see you going on and on about Turkey going into Syria to cause conflict with the Kurds. Half of whats wrong over there is one group hating on another internally...just think if every country in the world operated without regard or protections in place to guarantee liberty for everyone....there'd be no place safe and the world would be a mess. Granted it doesn't excuse interventionist practices but that's part of the point, those practices keep that hate in check and keeps it from growing. I don't have a magic answer and if anybody else did we'd be able to solve the problems.
The libertarians foreign policy is of non intervention ....their immigration policy is that of free entry to anyone who wants to come in. Do you not see how this could not cause internal security issues ?