Ghislaine Maxwell Redacted Documents

smartscheme (56)in #ghislainemaxwell • 4 years ago

The following documents were redacted improperly. In the event they are removed from archive.org, I will be doing to work to save them on the blockchain where they cannot be hidden nor censored. They will be copied and placed in comments below. Feel free to assist.

Post on Reddit:

Apparently the redactions weren't done properly for the pdfs and you can copy the text out from underneath the black bars and put them into Word or NotePad

via @ trappedpatriot on twitter:

So they screwed up bigtime on the redactions for the Ghislaine Maxwell release today. You can literally copy and paste the redacted pages into notepad and read them. Check out document #143 for a great example. #Epstein #Maxwell

https://pastebin.com/VHiDdX3V

Giuffre v. Maxwell - Links to the documents released on 07-30-2020 (which were under seal)

#epstein #humantrafficking #crimesagainstchildren #conspiracy

4 years ago in #ghislainemaxwell by smartscheme (56)

$21.36

Sort:

Trending

[-]

antisocialist (72) 4 years ago

https://ia801009.us.archive.org/25/items/gov.uscourts.nysd.447706/gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.31.0.pdf

https://ia801009.us.archive.org/25/items/gov.uscourts.nysd.447706/gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.82.0.pdf

https://ia801009.us.archive.org/25/items/gov.uscourts.nysd.447706/gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.66.0.pdf

https://ia801009.us.archive.org/25/items/gov.uscourts.nysd.447706/gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.136.0.pdf

These have been taken down without a backup on the wayback machine.

$0.61

4 votes

[-]

smartscheme (56) 4 years ago

I suspected this would happen. They prob kicking into overdrive since #BillClintonisaPedo was trending on Twitter. Damn!

$0.03

1 vote

[-]

smartscheme (56) 4 years ago

Taking a break on the comments but here is a video that summarizes the major takeaways of newly unsealed Maxwell / Epstein documents.

$0.09

2 votes

[-]

smartscheme (56) 4 years ago (edited)

https://www.archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.nysd.447706/gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.1.0.pdf

1
United States District Court
Southern District of New York
VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE,
Plaintiff, CASE NO:_____________________

v.
GHISLAINE MAXWELL,
Defendant.
________________________________/
COMPLAINT

Boies Schiller & Flexner LLP
575 Lexington Avenue
New York, NY 10022
(212) 446-2300

Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS Document 1 Filed 09/21/15 Page 1 of 12

$0.02

1 vote

[-]

smartscheme (56) 4 years ago

2
Plaintiff, VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE, formerly known as Virginia Roberts
(“Giuffre”), for her Complaint against Defendant, GHISLAINE MAXWELL (“Maxwell”), avers
upon personal knowledge as to her own acts and status and otherwise upon information and
belief:
NATURE OF THE ACTION

This suit arises out of Defendant Maxwell’s defamatory statements against
Plaintiff Giuffre. As described below, Giuffre was a victim of sexual trafficking and abuse while
she was a minor child. Defendant Maxwell not only facilitated that sexual abuse but, most
recently, wrongfully subjected Giuffre to public ridicule, contempt and disgrace by, among other
things, calling Giuffre a liar in published statements with the malicious intent of discrediting and
further damaging Giuffre worldwide.
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
This is an action for damages in an amount in excess of the minimum
jurisdictional limits of this Court.
This Court has jurisdiction over this dispute pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §1332
(diversity jurisdiction) as Giuffre and Maxwell are citizens of different states and the amount in
controversy exceeds seventy-five thousand ($75,000), exclusive of interest and costs.
This Court has personal jurisdiction over Maxwell. Maxwell resides in New York
City, and this action arose, and defamatory statements were made, within the Southern District of
New York.
Venue is proper in this Court as the cause of action arose within the jurisdiction of
this Court.
Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS Document 1 Filed 09/21/15 Page 2 of 12

$0.00

1 vote

[-]

smartscheme (56) 4 years ago

3
PARTIES

Plaintiff Giuffre is an individual who is a citizen of the State of Colorado.
Defendant Maxwell, who is domiciled in the Southern District of New York, is
not a citizen of the state of Colorado.
FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
Virginia Giuffre became a victim of sex trafficking and repeated sexual abuse
after being recruited by Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein when Giuffre was under the age
of eighteen.
Between 1999 and 2002, with the assistance and participation of Maxwell,
Epstein sexually abused Giuffre at numerous locations including his mansions in West Palm
Beach, Florida, and in this District. Between 2001 and 2007, with the assistance of numerous
co-conspirators, Epstein abused more than thirty (30) minor underage girls, a fact confirmed by
state and federal law enforcement.
As part of their sex trafficking efforts, Epstein and Maxwell intimidated Giuffre
into remaining silent about what had happened to her.
In September 2007, Epstein entered into a Non-Prosecution Agreement (“NPA”)
that barred his prosecution for numerous federal sex crimes in the Southern District of Florida.
In the NPA, the United States additionally agreed that it would not institute any
federal criminal charges against any potential co-conspirators of Epstein.
As a co-conspirator of Epstein, Maxwell was consequently granted immunity in
the Southern District of Florida through the NPA.
Epstein ultimately pled guilty to procuring a minor for prostitution, and is now a
registered sex offender.
Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS Document 1 Filed 09/21/15 Page 3 of 12

$0.00

1 vote

[-]

smartscheme (56) 4 years ago

Rather than confer with the victims about the NPA, the U.S. Attorney’s Office
and Epstein agreed to a “confidentiality” provision in the Agreement barring its disclosure to
anyone—including Epstein’s victims. As a consequence, the victims were not told about the
NPA.
On July 7, 2008, a young woman identified as Jane Doe No. 1, one of Jeffrey
Epstein’s victims (other than Giuffre), filed a petition to enforce her rights under the Crime
Victims’ Rights Act (“CVRA”), 18 U.S.C. ¶ 3771, alleging that the Government failed to
provide her the rights promised in the CVRA with regard to the plea arrangement with Epstein.
The litigation remains ongoing.
On or about May 4, 2009, Virginia Giuffre—identified then as Jane Doe No.
102—filed a complaint against Jeffrey Epstein in the United States District Court for the
Southern District of Florida. The complaint included allegations made by Giuffre that pertained
to Maxwell.
In pertinent part, the Jane Doe No. 102 complaint described in detail how
Maxwell recruited Giuffre (who was then a minor girl) to become a victim of sex trafficking by
introducing Giuffre to Jeffrey Epstein. With the assistance of Maxwell, Epstein was able to
sexually abuse Giuffre for years until Giuffre eventually escaped.
The Jane Doe No. 102 complaint contained the first public allegations made on
behalf of Giuffre regarding Maxwell.
As civil litigation against Epstein moved forward on behalf of Giuffre and many
other similarly-situated victims, Maxwell was served with a subpoena for deposition. Her
testimony was sought concerning her personal knowledge and role in Epstein’s abuse of Giuffre
and others.
Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS Document 1 Filed 09/21/15 Page 4 of 12

$0.00

1 vote

[-]

smartscheme (56) 4 years ago

To avoid her deposition, Maxwell claimed that her mother fell deathly ill and that
consequently she was leaving the United States for London with no plans of ever returning. In
fact, however, within weeks of using that excuse to avoid testifying, Maxwell had returned to
New York.
In 2011, two FBI agents located Giuffre in Australia—where she had been hiding
from Epstein and Maxwell for several years—and arranged to meet with her at the U.S.
Consulate in Sidney. Giuffre provided truthful and accurate information to the FBI about
Epstein and Maxwell’s sexual abuse.
Ultimately, as a mother and one of Epstein’s many victims, Giuffre believed that
she should speak out about her sexual abuse experiences in hopes of helping others who had also
suffered from sexual trafficking and abuse.
On December 23, 2014, Giuffre incorporated an organization called Victims
Refuse Silence, Inc., a Florida not-for-profit corporation.
Giuffre intended Victims Refuse Silence to change and improve the fight against
sexual abuse and human trafficking. The goal of her organization was, and continues to be, to
help survivors surmount the shame, silence, and intimidation typically experienced by victims of
sexual abuse. Giuffre has now dedicated her professional life to helping victims of sex
trafficking.
On December 30, 2014, Giuffre moved to join the on-going litigation previously
filed by Jane Doe 1 in the Southern District of Florida challenging Epstein’s non-prosecution
agreement by filing her own joinder motion.
Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS Document 1 Filed 09/21/15 Page 5 of 12

$0.00

1 vote

[-]

smartscheme (56) 4 years ago

Giuffre’s motion described Maxwell’s role as one of the main women who
Epstein used to procure under-aged girls for sexual activities and a primary co-conspirator and
participant in his sexual abuse and sex trafficking scheme.
In January, 2015, Maxwell undertook a concerted and malicious campaign to
discredit Giuffre and to so damage her reputation that Giuffre’s factual reporting of what had
happened to her would not be credited.
As part of Maxwell’s campaign she directed her agent, Ross Gow, to attack
Giuffre’s honesty and truthfulness and to accuse Giuffre of lying.
On or about January 3, 2015, speaking through her authorized agent, Maxwell
issued an additional false statement to the media and public designed to maliciously discredit
Giuffre. That statement contained the following deliberate falsehoods:
(a) That Giuffre’s sworn allegations “against Ghislaine Maxwell are untrue.”
(b) That the allegations have been “shown to be untrue.”
(c) That Giuffre’s “claims are obvious lies.”
Maxwell’s January 3, 2015, statement incorporated by reference “Ghislaine
Maxwell’s original response to the lies and defamatory claims remains the same,” an earlier
statement that had falsely described Giuffre’s factual assertions as “entirely false” and “entirely
untrue.”
Maxwell made the same false and defamatory statements as set forth above, in the
Southern District of New York and elsewhere in a deliberate effort to maliciously discredit
Giuffre and silence her efforts to expose sex crimes committed around the world by Maxwell,
Epstein, and other powerful persons. Maxwell did so with the purpose and effect of having
Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS Document 1 Filed 09/21/15 Page 6 of 12

$0.00

1 vote

[-]

smartscheme (56) 4 years ago

7
others repeat such false and defamatory statements and thereby further damaged Giuffre’s
reputation.

Maxwell made her statements to discredit Giuffre in close consultation with
Epstein. Maxwell made her statements knowing full well they were false.
Maxwell made her statements maliciously as part of an effort to conceal sex
trafficking crimes committed around the world by Maxwell, Epstein and other powerful persons.
Maxwell intended her false and defamatory statements set out above to be
broadcast around the world and to intimidate and silence Giuffre from making further efforts to
expose sex crimes committed by Maxwell, Epstein, and other powerful persons.
Maxwell intended her false statements to be specific statements of fact, including
a statement that she had not recruited an underage Giuffre for Epstein’s abuse. Maxwell’s false
statements were broadcast around the world and were reasonably understood by those who heard
them to be specific factual claims by Maxwell that she had not helped Epstein recruit or sexually
abuse Giuffre and that Giuffre was a liar.
On or about January 4, 2015, Maxwell continued her campaign to falsely and
maliciously discredit Giuffre. When a reporter on a Manhattan street asked Maxwell about
Giuffre’s allegations against Maxwell, she responded by saying: “I am referring to the statement
that we made.” The New York Daily News published a video of this response by Maxwell
indicating that she made her false statements on East 65th Street in Manhattan, New York, within
the Southern District of New York.

Case 1:15-cv-07433-RWS Document 1 Filed 09/21/15 Page 7 of 12

$0.00

1 vote

[-]

smartscheme (56) 4 years ago

https://www.archive.org/download/gov.uscourts.nysd.447706/gov.uscourts.nysd.447706.6.0.pdf

$0.00

[-]

smartscheme (56) 4 years ago

$0.00

[-]

hivebuzz (74) 4 years ago

Congratulations @smartscheme! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :

	You made more than 10 comments. Your next target is to reach 50 comments.
	You got more than 10 replies. Your next target is to reach 50 replies.

_{You can view your badges on your board And compare to others on the Ranking}
_{If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP}

To support your work, I also upvoted your post!

Do not miss the last post from @hivebuzz: