This moron is going viral on my facebook feed. Rather than argue with the bleeding heart liberals, I’ll change the scenario around.
If your child picks up a gun and enters the school because they are deranged psychopaths, do you give the other children guns to defend other children? Or do you give adults guns to protect children. This logic of giving guns to kids isn’t the answer either. The answer is arming teachers and security guards from psychopathatic children.
His scenario is about basic parenting. Not about dealing with psychopaths with guns. Liberal logic fails to impress me as usual.
Option D, which is the most widely accepted,:
Give each kid a trophy and send them to their safe space.
Here are some stats for everyone regarding this overdramatized gun debate:
-The lifetime risk of dying in a mass shooting is around 1 in 110,154 — about the same chance of dying from a dog attack or legal execution-
The lifetime chance of getting struck by lightning is 1/3000.
Wow
from a subjective traumatic experience like that, I would say that I would rather have the option to defend myself.
Option C would have to read:eliminate all sticks to be an accurate representation of gun control measures.
it's an emotive argument instead of a logical one; you have to respond with an emotional humdinger.
"assault rifles" cause up to 400 deaths a year
illegal aliens commit 4,000 homicides a year
you can tell who ACTUALLY cares about life by what they want to ban, against what they want more of
Liberals do not seem very 'liberal' or 'tolerant' when it comes to gun rights...
Honest, but out there opinion: If you are over 18, you should absolutely be permitted to carry, even on campus. You are an adult and any actions you do are your own responsibility and any acts to stop it are acts of coercion. Maybe I take that so seriously since I go to school in good ol Baltimore