Without downvoting rewards wouldn't make it outside the first 100 accounts.
They would just vote for themselves.
Much of the flagging discussions take place in this discord: https://discord.gg/yfd95Sy.
If you care to join the discussion you are free to do so.
I have already been talking with people on discord, and I think we have reached a solution that will ease the friction, this has been an issue for as long as I have been on this platform and to be honest, it gives off the feel, that as content creators we have very little say on this platform
Well, truthfully, the value we bring to the chain is secondary to creating it and not letting it get broken, imo.
If we had a 1000mv voting limit in place we wouldn't be having this discussion.
Eventually the inflation makes these largest accounts irrelevant, provided they can't maintain their percentage of the whole.
This was a big worry in 2016 and '17, and has driven off the greediest already.
I figured 5 years would show some improvement, and it has.
We are on the cusp of the math actually working the way it was designed.
If our whales can level the playing field a little more, of their own volition, this game will make a lot more sense to a lot more people, iyam.
A 1000mv voting limit could +/- 4x our vote values.
I reached out to someone, but I am not sure if they want to named and presented my idea to ease the tension between big accounts downvoting and content creators, so when a big account downvote's for a reward disagreement the user is notified that their content was downvoted to balance out rewards