By Neenah Payne
Dr. Anthony Fauci is the Director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease (NIAID) at the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Dr. Fauci was a prominent member of the White House Coronavirus Task Force in 2020. Fauci has been presented by the corporate media as a benevolent scientific guru who is dedicated to saving America from a “deadly pandemic”. However, a growing number of people are now raising key questions about Fauci’s role in the COVID-19 saga from start to finish.
The origin of COVID: Did people or nature open Pandora’s box at Wuhan? by New York Times writer Nicholas Wade begins:
“The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted lives the world over for more than a year. Its death toll will soon reach three million people. Yet the origin of pandemic remains uncertain: The political agendas of governments and scientists have generated thick clouds of obfuscation, which the mainstream press seems helpless to dispel. In what follows I will sort through the available scientific facts, which hold many clues as to what happened, and provide readers with the evidence to make their own judgments. I will then try to assess the complex issue of blame, which starts with, but extends far beyond, the government of China.”
Reporter Saagar Enjeti of “The Rising” online news show explains in the video below that the origins of the COVID-19 virus point to possible funding by the NIH and NIAID of the “gain-of-function” research to make the virus more deadly. Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky) and others have been grilling Dr. Anthony Fauci on his involvement in funding this controversial research that led to the COVID-19 outbreak. Enjeti explains that this investigation is not just about establishing responsibility for the COVID-19 crisis but is also key to avoiding another possibly bigger pandemic as $1.2 billion is being committed to more “gain of function” research! Enjeti provides excellent coverage of this critically-important topic which, as he shows, has been largely missing in the corporate media not only about who was responsible for COVID-19, but whether the research that may have caused COVID-19 is going to receive increased funding.
Did Fauci’s NIAID Help Fund Risky COVID Research?
Saagar Enjeti details the "lab leak hypothesis" and how it demonstrates the way "the culture war in America corrupts basic facts." He leads with the New York Times article by Nicholas Wade. Enjeti and Krystal Ball point out that dangerous “gain-of-function” research escapes labs almost every year. He explains that this risky research was banned during the Obama administration, but Fauci, a chief proponent of this research, worked to overturn that ban during the Trump administration.
Tucker Carlson mentions the article by Nicholas Wade of The New York Times.
COVID-19: Man-Made Bioweapon?
The Definition of a Bioweapon shows that when Senator Rand Paul (Ky) asked Dr. Fauci whether the NIAID or NIH had funded the “gain of function” research at the Wuhan Lab in China, Fauci denied any involvement. However, Dr. Richard Fleming said on The Highwire show on May 13 that Fauci perjured himself and explains how NIH and NIAID support dangerous “gain of function” research.
Dr. Fleming shows the patent for gain of function research for Corona funded by the NIH. He says everyone involved should be held accountable in international courts in a Nuremburg Trial for crimes against humanity. Dr. Fleming points out,
“Either this country is going to be held accountable by the rest of the world or the people who bypassed the safe guards like Fauci, Cowan, and the Department of Defense who gave money to Peter Daszak who gave it to Ralph Baric and Shi Zhengli -- either we’re going to be held accountable or the people who actually did this are going to be held accountable.”
Dr. Fleming explained,
“This virus is a man-made gain-of-function virus paid for by US taxpayers’ dollars including moneys that came from the Department of Defense. This is a bioweapon by every definition -- and by every definition, their having developed this, it is a violation of the Biological Weapons Conventions Treaty. This vaccine rollout is largest research project conducted in the history of mankind.”
Fauci Re-Authorized Dangerous “Gain-of-Function” Research
Senator Rand Paul (R-KY) clashed with on May 11 at a Senate Health Committee hearing about the origins of COVID-19 vis-a-vis NIH funding to the Wuhan Virology Institute. Sen. Paul (a medical doctor) grilled Fauci about his role in funding “gain-of-function” research on COVID.
Fauci Changes His Tune
Fauci Finally Admits COVID-19 May Have Come From Wuhan Lab, 'Not Convinced' Of Natural Origin:
Earlier this month, just hours after Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) dragged Anthony Fauci over pandemic misinformation - and the fact that Fauci's NIH funded risky collaborations at the Wuhan Institute of Virology - the nation's top virologist (and highest-paid government employee) furiously backpedaled over the origins of the pandemic in what we can only assume was an effort to redirect attention from his own culpability. Recall that since the beginning of the COVID-19 outbreak, Fauci parroted CCP talking points - insisting that the virus couldn't possibly have come from a Chinese lab.”
Yet, hours after Rand Paul's grilling - Fauci suddenly changed his tune during an afternoon Poynter event on "United Facts of America: A Festival of Fact-Checking," according to the Fox News.
When asked by Katie Sanders of Politifact if he was still confident that COVID-19 developed naturally, Fauci responded: "No actually. "I am not convinced about that, I think we should continue to investigate what went on in China until we continue to find out to the best of our ability what happened. Certainly, the people who investigated it say it likely was the emergence from an animal reservoir that then infected individuals, but it could have been something else, and we need to find that out. So, you know, that’s the reason why I said I’m perfectly in favor of any investigation that looks into the origin of the virus," he added, nervously.
As we noted in March, Fauci's NIH "funded a number of projects that involved WIV scientists, including much of the Wuhan lab's work with bat coronaviruses. While in 2017, Fauci's agency resumed funding a controversial grant without the approval of a government oversight body, according to the Daily Caller.
For context, in 2014, the Obama administration temporarily suspended federal funding for gain-of-function research on bat coronaviruses. Four months prior to that decision, Fauci's NIH effectively shifted this research to the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) via a grant to nonprofit group EcoHealth Alliance, headed by Peter Daszak. The NIH's first $666,442 installment of EcoHealth's $3.7 million grant was paid in June 2014, with similar annual payments through May 2019 under the "Understanding The Risk Of Bat Coronavirus Emergence" project.
Fauci Broke Multiple Criminal and Civil Laws
Starting at 107:20 in the Planet Lockdown David Martin Full Interview , Martin charges The Department of Health and Human Services, the Center for Disease Control, NIAID, NIH, with “Acts of Terror” as defined in a family of laws in 18 US Code in Sections 2339, 2331, sub-section 802 of the so-called "Patriot Act" and Section 1001 on "Funding Acts of Terror".
Martin explains that "Acts of Terror" are defined as "anything that is meant to coerce or intimidate a population into doing a behavior that ultimate harms them or could result in loss of life. There is no question that the actions that have been taken by the US FDA, by the CDC, by NIAID and by their conspiring parties and affiliated foundations have, in fact, resulted in the loss of lives and livelihoods for hundreds of lives -- potentially thousands of lives -- and millions of livelihoods. So, the 18 US Code Sections on "terror" and "terrorist financing", and the participation in terrorist acts are, in fact, open-and-shut situation with respect to what's unfolding."
Martin discusses in detail each of the criminal and civil laws Fauci and his collaborators have violated and concludes:
“THESE PEOPLE ARE CRIMINALS! The people who are controlling the narrative have violated six criminal statutes -- at least. They've violated five civil statutes -- at least…This is facts substantiated by federal records that I have produced and you'll be able to read and review on your own…Just because these individuals are not arrested and have not been tried, convicted, [or] found guilty of these things does not make them any less criminal.”
“We are being controlled by a criminal organization and our lives are being crashed into rocks by individuals who have willfully engaged in criminal actions since 1999. There have been 5,111 patents filed that have included claims or descriptions around SARS Coronavirus in the United States and around the world -- but that's the tip of the iceberg."
Danger of Ongoing Gain-of-Function Research
“We have also identified a number of other pathogens that have been equally prepared for this type of activity -- things like Zika virus, things like Ebola, and -- most problematic -- things like hemorrhagic fevers. Other real pathogens that cause real problems using the pathogen model around the world where amplification of pathogenicity and amplification of distribution have been explicitly the subject of funded research….
This is not just a campaign that has been designed to inflict this first round of terror on the population, but the very individuals organizing this set of actions have contemplated your future harm and is equally positioned to commercially exploit that as well. I think it's very probable that the same perpetrators who saw how easy it was to pull this stunt off, are going to try to pull it off using other alleged pathogens until We The People stand up and draw a line in the sand and say, 'We're not going to tolerate it'."
In Plandemic: Indoctornation, the film that went viral last year, Martin zeroes in at about 11 minutes on Fauci’s role in illegally funding “gain-of-function” research. He says around 12:30:
“In 2003, the Centers for Disease Control saw the possibility of a gold strike and that was the coronavirus outbreak that happened in Asia. They saw that a virus they knew could be easily manipulated was something that was very valuable and in 2003, they sought to patent it -- and they made sure that they controlled the proprietary rights to the disease, to the virus, and to its detection and to all of the measurement of it.
We know that Anthony Fauci, that Ralph Baric, the Center for Disease Control, and the laundry list of people who wanted to take credit for inventing coronavirus were at the hub of this story. From 2003-2018, they controlled 100% of the cash flow that built the empire around the industrial complex of coronavirus. While we know that the coronavirus manipulation started with Dr. Ralph Baric in 1999…in 2002, there was a recognition that the coronavirus was seen as an exploitable mechanism for both good and ill.”
Martin explains that in 2003, the CDC filed a patent on the coronavirus transmission to humans. However, under 35 US Code Section 101, nature is prohibited from being patented.
“Either SARS coronavirus was manufactured, therefore making a patent on it legal or it was natural, therefore making a patent on it illegal. If it was manufactured, it was a violation of biological and chemical weapons treaties and laws…. In either outcome, both are illegal….They had the means, they had the motive, and most of all, they had the monetary gain from turning coronavirus from a pathogen to profit.”
David Martin Challenges Fact Checkers
“In 2013, NIH said gain of function research on coronavirus should be suspended. The National Institutes of Health had a moral and social, and potentially legal reason to object to the research.”
However, the NIH said in letters to its researchers that the cessation was voluntary! Martin said that when the heat got hot in 2014-2015, NIH offshored the research and funded the Wuhan Institute of Virology to do the research. The NIH ran the money through a series of cover operations, including the Eco Health Alliance, Inc. headed by Peter Daszak which funds the Wuhan Lab.
Martin points out:
“The problem with all of this is that the evidence is right in front of our faces. When we are confronted with evidence, we are told that “fact checkers” are somehow transcendent.”
The Highwire show Exclusive, David Martin Challenges Fact Checkers says:
“As the leading voice in one of the most controversial and censored documentaries on the internet, David Martin, PhD, joins Del to discuss how his expertise in global finance played a unique part in understanding the illegality regarding the coronavirus patent, and debunking the debunkers.”
So, it is plausible to conclude that Fauci and his collaborators:
- Funded a global health threat
- Denied Americans access to 4 proven inexpensive cures that could have saved hundreds of thousands of lives and made the lockdown, masks, and rushed “vaccines” unnecessary
- Created hysteria and demand for a “vaccine” from which they profit exponentially
- Controlled the media to hide the disastrous results of lockdowns, masks, and “vaccines”
Dr. Zelenko Says: HCQ Deniers Are “Guilty of Mass Murder”In Doctors Love It, Fauci Hates It. Why?, Del Bigtree of The Highwire discusses Fauci’s strange opposition to HCQ, a proven inexpensive cure for COVID-19! The show says: “WHY With so many frontline doctors speaking up on their success treating Covid19 with a 65-year-old FDA-approved malaria drug, many wonder what would motivate our top health officials and social media platforms to silence their voices.”
Watch: In New Interview, Dr. Zelenko Says: HCQ Deniers Are “Guilty of Mass Murder” is an interview by Del Bigtree of The Highwire. The site says:
“As the Covid-19 treatment Hydroxychloroquine continues to be portrayed by MSM as an unsuccessful, dangerous drug, Vladimir Zelenko, MD has been saving his patients’ lives with his 'Zelenko Protocol' since March. In his first interview since his HCQ study was officially released, Del goes in depth with Zelenko about how he developed his protocol, the attack against the drug, and how his letter to the President might have changed history.”
Governor DeSantis: “We Chose Freedom Over Fauci-ism”
Steps We Can Take To Protect Our Freedom and Health
In her Planet Lockdown interview, Pam Popper discusses the disastrous role Fauci played in AIDS.
In COVID Operation: What Happened, Why It Happened, and What's Next, she explains the powerful role each of us plays in the outcome of this global coup based on choices we make now to just follow orders or to follow the real science.
Neenah Payne writes for Natural Blaze and Activist Post.