I don't see any legal problem with it. It is not defamatory nor misleading and deceptive in trade or commerce.
Pretty typical Tabloid headline.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I don't see any legal problem with it. It is not defamatory nor misleading and deceptive in trade or commerce.
Pretty typical Tabloid headline.
Thanks for that :-)
That sums it up for me, and the reason I expect independent journalists to have far higher standards than 'Freddie Starr ate my Hamster' ! They have to overcome the mass read media to present important topics in a fact based manner in their attempt to coerce readers into examining alternative viewpoints. I just feel using the self same, loathsome mechanisms to achieve this is self-defeating.
Best wishes and good luck with the ongoing legal battle.
It would be nice if my Hive Blog was the number one alternative media news source. :-)
But the reality is that Alex Jones is!!
Given the amount of censorship of anyone challenging the orthodoxy I'm happy to put up with some sensationalism from alternative news sources.