• Sign in
  • Sign up 
  • Welcome
  • FAQ
  • Block Explorer 
  • Night Mode
  • Stolen Accounts Recovery 
  • Change Account Password 
  • Vote for Witnesses 
  • Hive Proposals 
  • OpenHive Chat 
  • Developer Portal 
  • Hive Whitepaper 
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
logo
  • Posts
  • Proposals
  • Witnesses
  • Our dApps
LoginSign up
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Himalayan Salt

  • View the full context
  • View the direct parent
greenbeans (44)in #health • 8 years ago

Yes. From personal experience and what others report.
http://www.truthwiki.org/wikipedia-2/

I also spoke to a lawyer last year and he told me that lawyers can not use Wikipedia for evidence because it is not based on facts.
https://www.naturalnews.com/046611_Wikipedia_Truth_Wiki_internet_censorship.html

Wikipedia admits fake account and starts cleaning itself
https://www.naturalnews.com/042657_Wikipedia_sock_puppets_disinformation.html
http://www.tadakaluri.org/wikipedia-is-blocking-accounts-that-get-paid-to-edit-pages

Wikipedia blackmails people
https://www.naturalnews.com/052396_Wikipedia_blackmail_engine_Jimmy_Wales.html

Wikipedia is controlled by Big Pharma.
https://www.naturalnews.com/041406_Wikipedia_propaganda_disinformation.html

http://www.rigged.news/2015-11-30-extreme-bias-at-wikipedia-on-homeopathic-medicine-3.html

http://www.livingfree.news/2017-03-10-wikipedia-has-become-a-dangerous-platform-for-medical-disinformation-and-propaganda.html

http://buzz.naturalnews.com/001206-Wikipedia-scientific_censorship-petition.html

Wikipedia is controlled by a small group.
http://www.thedailybell.com/news-analysis/wikipedia-as-elite-propaganda-mill/

8 years ago in #health by greenbeans (44)
$0.00
    Reply 0
    Sort:  
  • Trending
    • Trending
    • Votes
    • Age