Sort:  

I'll remember him too.

Did you catch the part that "93% of the steem rests in 1% of the users"?

Tell me what "hundreds of minnows and dolphins" are going to do.

Saying "I've got your back" is pandering bullshit, and if I can see that, he probably does too.

@aggroed just has better manners than me.

Witness voting is based per user, so, ya those hundreds of users can have an effect for Aggroed. As for for upvoting & re-steeming and the 93%, like I said our votes will continue to gain power, unless of course you choose to wallow in self pity, bullshit cheap shots, & poetry.

Is it wallowing in self pity to point out that a system is designed to be unfair?

Unless you are going to join the wealthy crowd FIRST and then profit from gaming Steemit, you're delusional. Speaking of cheap shots...

And nothing wrong with wallowing in poetry. Except for those that see no value in anything not cash, and are incapable of seeing actual value in the content of a man's speech.

OK, let's say a bunch of whales start flagging every post he makes.

Tell me, What are you going to do for him (or her, I guess)?

If you had the intellectual honesty to admit you were just sucking up, I could respect that.

Pander, seems to be working just fine.

You do that. I have no interest in pandering. Neither do I have any interest in a system that considers pandering valuable speech.

Neither do almost all the people Steemit needs to become a platform capable of more than a Ponzi scheme.