My pleasure. I understand it's all very confusing. Unfortunately, when you're dealing with such a complex system, nothing is simple.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
My pleasure. I understand it's all very confusing. Unfortunately, when you're dealing with such a complex system, nothing is simple.
It seems to me that for us, a curation team who has spent years not being appreciated for thousands of hours of collective, voluntary work, can vote mostly below the 20 steem threshold despite having numerous high-end supporters and delegators (gtg, curie etc). This means that what we could argue as one of the highest quality sub-cultures on the platform, with a focus on STEM content, run by legitimately qualified scientists and academics and a dedicated team painstakingly quantifying quality and filtering plagiarism, can now, after years of effort, give its authors 57% less than they were getting.
Is this inaccurate?
The idea is to make things as simple as possible, but no simpler.