Maybe it's not intentional 🤷♂
Stake based systems are very interesting because there are a lot of people with different interests so getting the majority aligned on anything will be challenging.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Maybe it's not intentional 🤷♂
Stake based systems are very interesting because there are a lot of people with different interests so getting the majority aligned on anything will be challenging.
Yes, and when potentially billions of dollars are on the line, you can't trust just anybody.
I get that, but I can also recognize talent.
My perceptions of good intent may be questionable, but actions would speak louder than unfounded suspicions, imo.
We are in an age of invisible code, machine characters capable of execution that don't print and can only be seen in the binary.
But, being of the restivus, I think they shot the project in the foot, intentionally.
Could they have a good reason, yes.
Are they gonna publicly state it, doubtful.
Years ago I was told that when the layer one codebase was ready for mass adoption that smart contracts would be worked on.
We are getting those now, afaict.
The more money that is on the line, the more people you need to be able to trust.
It’s not possible for 1 person to manage a situation when there is that much money on the line. In my opinion anyways.
I think most things in life seem more coordinated than they are.
Maybe you are right. But I’m always more inclined to believe that usually stuff didn’t work out for a variety of reasons that we are not always privy to.