CLICK ABOVE TO SEE THE VIDEO ^^

David Irving - The Manipulation of History Part 1/4

What is historical objectivity? How do we know when a historian is telling the truth? Aren’t all historians, in the end, only giving their own opinions about the past? Don’t they just select whatever facts they need to support their own interpretations and leave the rest in the archives? Aren’t the archives full of preselected material anyway? Can we really say that anything historians present to us about the past is true? Aren’t there, rather, many different truths, according to your political beliefs and personal perspectives? Questions such as these have been preoccupying historians for a long time. In recent years, they have become, if anything, more urgent and more perplexing than ever. The debate about them has repeatedly gravitated toward the Nazi extermination of the Jews during the Second World War. If we could not know for sure about anything that happened in the past, then how could we know about this most painful of all topics in modern history?

Click the source below to read the rest ...

Sources:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Irving
https://hollowhoax.com/2018/02/16/david-irving-the-manipulation-of-history/

THANK YOU for your support and for your UPVOTE and RESTEEM my post together with a COMMENT so that I can upvote your comments.
LETS GROW TOGETHER!

▶️ DTube
▶️ IPFS