Some of us become very happy when they get an autoupvote everyday. It's nice when you know that you will be rewarded anyway after creating any kind of content. But there is also an other side of this. Sometimes when we get good autoupvotes we may never get a bigger upvote after that because we all know that the first upvotes are the most important to earn better curation rewards.
That's why I think that the autoupvote is so tricky. If each of our content will have a lot of autoupvotes with low total rewards in the end, we may prefer to get a good upvote from a whale sometimes rather of having little ones every single day. It maybe more profitable anyway.
Maybe the system itself should be changed somehow. Because I see that manual curators are not that rewarded that way. Most curators prefer to upvote what will be upvoted after instead of upvoting the quality. I think this can be changed if at least the big investor who has more power can reward other curators somehow, randomly but not automatic. Also if the amount of rewards will be limited for those who are autoupvoting the posts that are doing always well even if it's low quality.
Anyway, I'm writing this just to see some improvement in the blockchain because I'm investing here more than $1000 in @dcooperation and enough time to see everything improving here !