I heard one of the Bigelsen brothers speaking at Anarchapulco. Fascinating stuff. If we can diagnose illness from a simple blood sample and treat the condition with homoeopathy, it makes the entire medical-industrial complex redundant.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
One drop of blood: didn't Theranos make this claim?
But The Wall Street Journal reported in 2015 and 2016 that Theranos' devices were inaccurate and that the company was secretly resorting to running blood tests on other companies' machines, the very ones her company was supposed to be disrupting.
But the technology was faulty. Whenever someone would ask how Theranos could do what it purported to do, Holmes and others would respond that discussing the inner workings of their machines would reveal trade secrets. Theranos had simply repurposed commercially available blood analysis technology to run on smaller amounts of blood, The Wall Street Journal revealed in October 2015.
More here: https://www.nbcnews.com/business/business-news/elizabeth-holmes-verdict-theranos-trial-rcna9022
Of course this could be the case with the Bigelsens, however, they seem genuine and anxious to share information. No matter whether you believe we're in a simulacrum, a video game or a world created as a test where we earn eternal punishment or reward, don't you think that it's pretty perfectly designed? Isn't it the sort of perfection which would include a simple diagnostic tool like this?
This has been on my mind, actually, esp. "a world created as a test where we earn eternal punishment or reward" - and reading of the Bigelsens led me today to reading about "psychic Edgar Cayce (pronounced Casey), who died in 1945 at age 67..."
https://www.chicagotribune.com/1987/05/17/the-search-for-past-life/
Interesting! There are more things in heaven and earth an' all that.