I invest in this project, contributing significantly despite facing sabotage from certain members within the Hive community. Unfortunately, the pattern of libel persists, even with the existence of three playable games. What's disheartening is the preferential treatment given to projects without games or with a history of project abandonment, while those actively contributing face unwarranted negativity.
The Hive ecosystem, with its potential for growth, is hindered by its own members. It's discouraging to witness the constant efforts to impede progress, particularly for those not aligned with the old guard. There's an implicit message that projects are better off launching on alternative chains, or else they face resistance.
This situation raises valid concerns about how investors can recoup their investments when a community, including influential figures, consistently undermines the project with baseless accusations, driving people away. Despite these challenges, the project has successfully integrated the game into over two dozen Discord communities and remains committed to expanding within the Hive ecosystem.
It's disheartening to see certain individuals exert control over curation, promoting self-interest through @theycallmedan's curation, while overlooking projects with tangible accomplishments. The project has already launched three playable games and has a roadmap for continuous development.
It's noteworthy that, despite the founder's apparent love and loyalty to Hive, there is a unanimous vote among founders to explore opportunities outside Hive. The dichotomy between the founder's commitment and the unanimous decision to leave raises questions. Founders are actively considering grant offers from Myria, SKALE & Mantle, as well as venture capital firm offers, which interestingly, entail moving away from Hive.
The contemplation of leaving Hive seems almost fateful, especially considering the external opportunities and support available elsewhere. It's essential to consider the implications of the current environment on the project's growth and success. Encouraging dialogue and understanding between the community and the founder could be a constructive step forward, fostering an environment of support rather than driving away valuable projects.
Thank you for giving me an idea what to write and post about today sir.
https://inleo.io/@dynamicrypto/a-call-to-unity-in-the-hive-community
Funny how he admits to self voting. Which is exactly that.
More insider scams. This person brings little to now value to the chain and milks the reward pool for simple curation help?
This is a great joke. And shows how this blockchain is doomed especially with leadership like this...
Besides hive whales backstabbing established projects.
Chill dude, go smoke a joint and stop hating.
Seriously?
Yep you are exactly the issue... Ha!