You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: The Scientific Method to be Thrown Out!

Sigh...

All of these things are well documented facts.

But, modern science doesn't like to talk about them... sooooo, the average person believes them to be lies. (mostly because bow-tie wearing actor says they are fallacious)

We aren't talking theories here, but demonstrable facts.
I would love to start talking about stuff that is way off the beaten path.
Like how chance actually operates.
And how time really works.
But these things get weird. Really weird.
And i am not getting traction on the simple stuff.

Sort:  

"All of these things are well documented facts."

No. None of them are. Your mood does not affect the sunrise, and it doesn't affect reproduction of bacteria in a petri dish, the power output of a new iteration of laser, or any other experiment involving hard science (not psychiatry or sociology or such).

You could find some fraudulent studies that no one has ever been able to replicate to support your claims, and the problem of replication is indeed a blight on the entire field. Pseudoscience depends on it. You could change my mind with peer reviewed studies that have been replicated, but there aren't any that support your claims.

What's far sadder to me is that the industry is collapsing under the weight of corruption and political propaganda. Journals I trusted sold out to Pfizer and the MIC during the plandemic, and every potentially politically significant metric presents an attack surface that can, and in many cases already has, completely destroy the scientific method.

There is no basis for your statement that scientists aver they're not part of the universe. Neither is there any basis for saying what they want influences what results they get. Many frauds cherry pick data, put their thumbs on their scales, or just plain falsify their results. That does not support your claim.

In fact, it refutes it, because if they could get the results they wanted from their experiments just by wanting it hard enough they wouldn't have to commit fraud.

It's just silly.

Edit: you point to such a fraudulent study about ice crystals.

"This experiment is very repeatable."

Yet you supply no citations showing it was replicated. Typical.