Yep, no "honest physicist" claims, but the teachers do, the "scientific" pundits do…
Do you see that when you tried to discount my statement of "if gravity exists because of mass, we could get a paper to stick to a wall" you also disproved Cavendish's experiment.
These, not honest physicists have upheld that gravity is a property of mass for far too long. The Electric-Universe Theory is far better at modelling our solar system. Light years ahead of the competition, and it is just dismissed as you have dismissed me as being unknowing.
But, science is science, and flying cars will be in our face, and i really hope that the "not honest physicists" don't come out saying that there is upsidasium in those cars.
Scientism isn't science, but the opposite of science. Fauci became the antiscience when he claimed to be the science.
No, I don't. Being attracted to the wall isn't being attracted enough to 'stick to the wall' and overcome the attraction to the far greater mass of the Earth below the paper and the wall. Perhaps your language is imprecisely conveying that sentiment?
I do, however, appreciate your forbearance and the thickness of your skin, which my remarks must surely have pricked.
We don't need upsidasium for flying cars. We'd have better cars with upsidasium though.