Yes, i comprehend your viewpoint.
And i discussed herein, how it is not free-energy.
It is, a perpetual motion machine, and charged high enough will spin a genset.
And if T.H.E.Y. didn't push Newton and Einstein so much, we would know that "gravity" is an electro-magnetic function, and be able to use it at will.
Free-energy is tapping into the power that creates the universe. Power that could burn the Earth out of existence.
Humbly, We swim in a sea of energy – the aether. In fact, particles are standing waves of energy in the sea.
And free energy tech draws on that energy in the aether.
The work of the late Dr. Paul A. LaViolette, called subquantum kinetics (SQK), where He took an "as above, so below" approach, applying chemical kinetics to the subquantum, shows that there is an aether, and that We can draw on the energy there freely.
When He first saw that, He thought He had erred, and combed His work over and over looking for where He had done so. Then He encountered the work of T.Townsend Brown – who My father was working with on electrogravitics – and saw that Brown was demonstrating precisely what SQK predicted.
Yes, energy is free. Or would be if the moneyed psychopaths did not avidly hide and suppress the tech.
And BTW... SQK is a counter theory to the einsteinian bunk that was foisted onto Us because it did not predict the energy in the aether, with all its ad hoc additions ("dark matter," "dark energy," etc.), its "renormalaizations" where the math goes to infinity and reality does not, "mysteries," and "bending of spacetime" (another ad hoc element.
SQK needs no ad hoc things, no renormalization, has no "mysteries, and is euclidean.
SQK: https://starburstfound.org/category/research/subquantum-kinetics/
The trouble here is semantics.
I am trying to be extra specific, and the world just uses these words willy-nilly.
Like "Zero point energy" is a specific experiment where they cooled various elements to 0° K, where atoms are not supposed to be moving anymore. Because, that is how they defined 0°K. And they found that some atoms were still moving. Soooo, there is energy at the zero point.
And, a bunch of futurists, psychics, spiritualists glomed onto the phrase. Because, everything came from the zero, in many Buddhist texts. So, now everyone is using "zero point energy" with a meaning that doesn't mean anything from its origins… accept that it does, maybe.
SQK… is there something really something below quantum? Or is this just an modernized name for studying Aether theories? Or another Electric Universe model? And the real problem here, is semantics.
So, what do you call a magnet motor? Something that spins just by the power of magnets. And charges your cars super-capacitors continuously, so you can drive forever.
Magnetics is a function of the aether, so, is it aether energy?
I leave "free energy" to mean that stuff that is creating our universe. Enough energy to create thing out of nothing. Enough energy to pop Earth out of existence. And, it is really simple, but we can't see it, can't really think about it.
Indeed, semantics. I prefer "free energy" because it is energy We can access and not have to pay for. Once the right setup has been started, no further payments are needed to have abundant energy flowing.
We pay for the energy to start it, but get more energy in return, and that overunity is free.
Anyway, the point is that with it, We do not have to account for Our energy added. i.e., We don't need money, the foundational function of which is to account for the energy We add into a system.
Once money is obsolete, everything is free.
Well, the first step will be small communities with their own, non-polluting, continuous energy systems.
on the money thing, we will shift to crypto (so no more money printing) and then we will shift to a person backed money, where people have worth, the currency is measure in.
then it is… something to do with inter-small-community settlement layer thingy.
And after a bit more, people will feel they really do not need the money (after everyone learns to give and get)
Why do We need money (in any form, including electronic bits) if We have free energy, and why do We have to wait for "communities" to build up?
It's not a matter of "giving" and "getting." We have 80% and more of Us doing jobs that just push money around. With free energy and automation of needed work no One wants to do (non-creative), the creative needed work will have plenty of Us willing to do it for the thanks, appreciation, renown, and such that They get.
And the money jobs will vanish while everything is freely available, provided by automation and Ones who are doing what They love to do that helps the most.
Find What You Love to Do that Helps the Most (article): https://peakd.com/truth/@amaterasusolar/find-what-you-love-to-do-that-helps-the-most