Of course we know all of Einstein's work was plagiarized. And we know that the speed of light varies, knocking off one of Einstein's assumptions for the Theory of Relativity. But is the ideas Einstein's theories postulates completely wrong?
Einstein's theories describe space being curved, and that this is due to mass or speed "stretching" it. What if space is indeed curved, and mass has nothing to do with it?
It is so much easier to just throw away the entire theory and start over. You do not know what baggage you bring with you when trying to modify a theory. However, it is the way the brain works. If there is a systme involving several variables, the high IQ person can imagine moving one of the variables while keeping the others stagnant. Very high IQ people can move several. (however, this is a misnomer, because if you take your average artist minded type person, they can move all the variables, but they have a problem keeping the frame stationary. So, the previous statement is about science minded people) So, when we got a theory, and it is not quite right, we move only a piece of it, and if it works, stop there. We do not go into moving all the pieces in various ways, and usually only give fleeting thought to variables that we don't know about.
We can see this in how Modern Materialistic Science has come up with "dark matter" and "dark energy". And just accepted it as real (and millions are spent trying to find something that was defined as you can't find it). But, what about ideas such as Electric Universe model? (which is poo-pooed even though it explains a lot of things better than relativity or string theories) What about their being a large and small galactic force? A force that spins the galaxy. Which would very easily describe why there are so many spiral galaxies.
There are so many things to ponder, and most science teachers cram into children's heads that it is gravity that makes the solar system and galaxy work! That it is all figured out. Although it is anything but…
The Speed of Light = Plank Constant
Einstein's theories rely on the assumption that the speed of light is constant. And constant from every person's perspective.
Unfortunately, the speed of light has varied over time. The assumption doesn't hold, and thus the Theory of Relativity doesn't hold. (It should never have been an accepted theory in the first place)
So, what is the speed of light? It can be described as the maximum speed the photon can visit every single Plank Square. Lets think of space as a computer monitor. And the left most pixel is lighted, and then each time clock, the pixel that is lighted moves over one pixel. And, we watch the pixel seem to move across the screen. The speed of light is based on how big the grid is (Plank Constant) and how fast the system clock is.
The Plank Constant is not uniform
Now the problem with this arrangement is we believe the grid is completely uniform. We do this because that is the way Cartesian systems train the brain. You know, like graph paper. However, the universe seems to be more like bubbles of sea foam. Lots of bubbles, all connected in a grid of sorts, with various sizes of bubbles.
The universe seems to be very lazy in its display algorithm. If no one is there to see it, the universe doesn't bother rendering it. And this seems to hold true to the dimension of space too. Like, out in between galaxies, there are really big bubbles, and in between solar systems there are smaller bubbles, and in between planets there are smaller bubbles, and within planets we have some of the finest bubbles.
And so, we find the shape of the universe warped/curved in all directions. One of these that we can see was used as evidence of Einstein's theory being true. When we actually discover this by learning to measure other areas beside near Earth, it will change everything we think about the basis of reality.
Space + Time = 1
Imagine if you put all your focus on time. You would find that you have little awareness of space.
Imagine if you put all your focus on space, the similarly you wouldn't have much awareness of time.
This is the same as Heisenberg Uncertainty Principal. Where you can know the location of a particle, but then you do not know its momentum (direction and speed), or you can focus on the momentum, and then you do not know where it is. Of course, you can sorta know both to various degrees. Always giving up some of one, to get some of the other.
So, if you are moving very fast. (You are focusing on changing your location each time unit.) You will experience very little time in that reality. Very similar to how Relativity is hypothesized to work. "You approach the speed of light, and you stop aging".
The thing we will probably find is that there are more sides to this equation than just time and space. Such as your vibration (spiritual term. Your vibration would define how many frames per second you could handle, so your system clock)
If we have two variables, it defines a line, or a volume control, 100% on one end, 0% on the other end. With two we make a triangle. With three, we make a solid, like a tetrahedron. And anywhere in the tetrahedron, the units all add up to 100%
So, space is curved, just as Einstein said, but not because mass warps space. (although it sorta does, because there is more focus, and so finer bubbles, where more beings are)
And as you go faster, time slows down. But not because the speed of light is uniform or constant.
And dark energy and dark matter do not need to exist. Because there isn't any missing. What is missing is our logic. We have been blinded to gravity holding the universe together. This is similar to why scientists smashing particles together is silly, when what they are really looking for is the paths, the structure created inside the atom, between the nucleus and the electrons.
Science in the future is going to be so fun to explore! It is so sad that Modern Materialistic Science must put a governor upon us to keep us from advancing.
What if Einstein was working for the moneyed psychopaths in control on Our planet (by virtue of money), and They gave Him a theory that did not predict the energy in the aether (and a lot of money to say He came up with it)?
When You grasp that there is a counter-theory to the einsteinian bunk, with its ad hoc elements ("dark matter," "dark energy." etc.), its "renormalizations" (where the math goes to infinity and reality does not), and many "mysteries," and is euclidean (no need for ad hoc "bending of space/time"), You might want to rethink the idea that the einsteinian BS is at all correct.
Dr. Paul A. LaViolette used an "as above, so below" approach, taking chemical kinetics and applying them subquantumly. What He discovered was that He could explain it all. No "mysteries." And...
It predicts the energy in the aether, and that We can extract it. When He first saw that, He thought He erred. He comed and combed His work, trying to find where. Then He learned of the work of T. Townsend Brown (electrogravitics) and saw that it was demo0nstrating exactly what He counter-theory predicted.
That theory is subquantum kinetics (SQK).
I am giving highest probability LaViolette got it right, and that the einsteinian crap was foised on Us.
SQK: https://starburstfound.org/category/research/subquantum-kinetics/
Electrogravitics PDF: https://starburstfound.org/downloads/aerospace/NASA-SEOP.pdf