Make sure to avoid conflict of interest @informationwar, so these links are taken seriously. You must provide information that supports both sides of the story and publicly declare your neutrality towards the events.
Ignore all of the above if you have already taken sides.
I am against Ned and Justin Sun. Ned has mismanaged, lied, and done unethical things over the last 4 years, so has Justin Sun.
Whether or not anything is legally binding is another story, and that is different from what Steemit promised to not do.
Even if it was legal for Ned to sell Steemit Inc to Justin Sun, and Justin Sun to use that stake, it doesn't make a difference... The chain was attacked and taken over by Justin Sun, that is what is important.
This isn't a quesiton of legality for me as I don't care, most laws are arbitrary and I am not voluntarily allowed to get away from the government(they enslave us all and we are born as slaves into it). This is showing that Steemit Inc AKA Ned and team used a ninja mine give themselves a centralizing stake over their "decentralized blockchain".
People who are for decentralization cannot be neutral to this. This is a rich person (Justin Sun has 200 million USD+) using their money to centralize a blockchain and do whatever he wants. Theres no neutrality....
@truthforce writing
Most laws are BS, so you are an anarchist? You can't just love the laws that serve you and hate the laws the serve other people, duty and right, right?
Ned has mismanagedit's his company why should we care? what do you mean by mismanaged? Not doing things in favor of other people instead of his?This isn't a question of legality for me as I don't careThen how to define what's wrong or good, how can we know that what happened is wrong if we don't have a framework to judge the situation?I was hoping that I can see someone like you to fight for a governance system that is more immune against such a thing. Not bashing one side only while the other side was controlling the governance for almost 4 years.
People who are for decentralization cannot be neutral to this.Because 60 people choosing to freeze the stake of someone on a Blockchain is clearly decentralized. But hey, they are not Chinese, at least, so it's ok.You need to make things improve, make both sides accountable for what they did. I am not loving the situation, and don't support both sides, but what I really know is that if we keep this mentality of emotions over data, facts, and analysis we will go nowhere.
Thank you!
This is the last reply im giving you because you are someone who just constantly comes up with tons of questions and it never ends. Its too time consuming.
Most laws are bullshit
Ned mismanaged his company.
Laws don't define what's wrong or good, morals and ethics do.
Someone like me fighting for governance system? You have no idea who I even am or anything about me.
60 witnesses choosing to freeze the stake of someone who ninjamined it is a moral good. The ninja mine was mined in mostly secret with little details provided on how to mine Steem. They(Dan and Ned) did this so that they could release their coin to themselves via mining instead of diong an ico. They skirted the law and enriched themselves.
I don't need to make anything improve or make any side accountable for anything.
@truthforce writing