Any coercion of any kind whatsoever is violation of Nuremberg as the document clearly states, so even if the people were given full disclosure, there would still be no informed consent for anyone coerced into signing up for it, even if they were coerced into making the ‘choice’ with more subtle pressure than even threat of loss of job. So criminal on so many levels, it is heartbreaking to see the destruction these psychopaths are wreaking, in so many ways. And NY Times has the gall to now insist they are not just safe anymore, but "overwhelmingly safe," and yet simultaneously concede there are "rare" adverse events. But how many individually rare events must there be before they are collectively no longer rare? because the authorities have now even admitted like a dozen such 'rare' effects. Never have I witnessed such vile and demonstrably deceptive propaganda or such disregard for humanity in my life.
Freedom!
I'm not satisfied with "rare". How many is that? Why aren't we allowed to know? Why is the only number we're supposed to care about the inflated Covid death count?
100% agree. I only point out that even according to their admissions, there are by now enough ‘rare’ effects that combined they can no longer objectively be considered rare... They are clearly far from rare, and I think we are not allowed to know because if we were, the people would realize that the injuries are indeed not rare at all. Sinister it is, the nature of it all. When enough people finally wake up to the reality, there will be hell to pay for the ones deceiving humanity.
Absolutely. I appreciate your thoughtful comments.
If you're interested in risk analysis at all, I'm not sure if you've seen this article yet: https://tobyrogers.substack.com/p/what-is-the-number-needed-to-vaccinate
It gets pretty specific with the math, using official numbers. My takeaway is that in the elderly, except maybe in outlying cases, it's safer to get Covid. For kids, it's completely ridiculous to be considering the injections. And he was very conservative with the assumptions. It's probably a lot more extreme than that, because official numbers are skewed as you well know. Bottom line: there's now even statistical analysis - which nobody has found fault with - that shows we ought to avoid this thing. Of course, pro-vaxxers will do mental gymnastics to avoid this fact because it doesn't fit with the psyop that is ruling their thinking. "That math is anti-vaxx!" might be the retort.