What's the practical upshot?
Are you suggesting some sort of "genetic superiority" of the "polarians"?
What do you believe this "means" to you?
Are MOBSTERS and CON-ARTISTS not employing the exact same tactics regardless of their "genetic makeup"?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Superiority? No. "I" suggested nothing. Try not to focus on what "I" think. I posed a question. To find out, what I asked. If you this meant anything to YOU at all.
Check out how you replied.
Discover your fallacies.
Did you even answer the question?
Interesting Assumption you make with your question.
Mobsters can do whatever they want, when they hold the keys, that no-one else know exist. Do you realize what I am saying?
They can manipulate the natural course of the cycle of our planet. They can guide racial gardens for their own farm, with the sheep being, anyone that is not aware of their own past, or 'race'.
It would behoove you do discover your own 'roots'.
Behavior is not just 'random' or 'environmental'.
There is no 'superior' there is 'complimentary' for forming a functioning being as a whole.
There are reasons that each race was rooted in the place they were.
Can you cut a Trees roots out from under it and watch it thrive, nay, Survive?
Well, your use of the word "mongrel" seemed at least passingly "derogatory".
Didn't humans spring from the plains of Africa (about 8 million years ago) and then find refuge in the "fertile crescent" and then spread along similar latitudinal ranges growing similar crops and raising similar animals?
Don't humans adapt to different geographical environments, regardless of their "origins"?
Are you proposing we're being genetically funneled towards either the ELOI or the MORLOCKS?
I mean, aren't humans going to be obsolete in just a few more years?
11 minutes,
"SEEMED" - It was not my word. That is 'THEIR' word. Check out that article I linked with it.
No. Assumption based on your programming.
I am proposing that we already are there. The 'intensity' and 'perfection of system' is increasing though, as it has before in the far past, before it crumbled each time.
If 'they' have their way yes.
Are you on 'their side'? If you say Yes or anything Nihilistic, then you are.
Humanity is being killed by the Consenting Humans. With Free Will.
The majority crush the small amount of (freeThinkers). Free Will. The Free Will of the 'Majority', has been guided by a "Minority" to crush the Majority(self) and worship that Minority. Anything else in the way (freeThinkers) will be crushed.
"Transhumanism" is 'a' goal.
Do you think FREEWILL is logically incoherent?
Do you think FREEWILL is just another (powerful) CON-GAME?
They are good questions that I have already attempted to answer but failed :)
I still ponder this question. I do not know.
Manipulation of it is. That's the con. The 'Golden Web'.
We do have our Free Will.......in 'their' eye.
Here's the problem.
There are only two possible options.
(EITHER)
(1) your thoughts (and actions) are contextual (caused by previous experiences, including your biology).
(OR)
(2) your thoughts (and actions) are random (uncaused by any previous experiences).
If you pick #1, then your thoughts (and actions) relate to your memory and the world around you (contextual). This means your thoughts (and actions) are potentially USEFUL TO YOU AND OR OTHERS.
If you pick #2, then your thoughts (and actions) don't necessarily relate to anything at all. And as a matter of fact, statistically, it would be extremely unlikely that any RANDOM thought or action would be even remotely or incidentally USEFUL TO YOU AND OR OTHERS.
Now you might try to mix the two options, some caused, some uncaused, and that's fine.
Your useful thoughts and actions MUST BE CAUSED.
YOur "free" thoughts and actions are TAUTOLOGICALLY COUNTERPRODUCTIVE (99.999% of the time).
TSAAFW (The Standard Argument Against Free Will)
SOURCE CONVO