You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Modern Materialistic Science vs Ontology

in Informationwar8 months ago (edited)

"Physics and Metaphysics are one continuum."

No, and it's a silly claim. Metaphysics aren't real. So einfach is das. Science isn't Scientism, and it appears you confuse them, and thus equate fantasy and wishful thinking with empirical evidence and reproducible observation. They are not the same. Baseless claims sourced in fantastic dogmas are simply insuperable, and your faith isn't backed up by demonstrable evidence. Were such potential to it, you would be capable of providing it.

Thanks!

Sort:  

Where does Near Death Experiences fall into your idea of science?

Are they quantifiable? Are there notable prerequisites and repeatable metrics?

They're incapable of testability. Nothing about them is potential of science - actual knowledge - and they are only anecdotes. Inform me when you can set up experiments to test whatever theories you have about NDE's, and I'll carefully examine your proposals for evidence of bias. I'll be very happy to find none, and carefully consider any reproducible evidence.

LOL Who are we kidding? That will never, ever happen, because some girls will dance around with crystals on a full moon and that will be PROOF that Satan is God, or smth.

The problem here is that the evidence for NDE is legion.

And then we run into the problem of:

  • Is there a tree? Most people can see, touch, experience the tree. (but can we really prove it?)
  • Is there an aura? There are people that can see auras. There is camera methods to show that there is something there. But, since most people cannot see it, do we say that it does not exist?
  • Is there NDEs? There are a lot of people who have experienced much the same thing. Basically, they have all come back and said, "there is a tree there"

And what happens when Satan is proven to have been a god, that was written about in the Torah? The problem is, this involves aliens, and a lot of old texts, and a particular interpretation.

And many scientists have tried to induce NDEs, And many have experienced something. How do we handle that information? Is it proof or evidence?

"...the evidence for NDE is legion."

What is legion are claims without any evidence.

"Most people can see, touch, experience the tree."

That's what evidence is. It is means of verification that something is actual. Claims are not evidence.

"...camera methods..."

LOL

You're floundering, and you know it. You're Flailing about trying to come up with a sound basis for insuperable claims. At this point you have realized you're barking up the wrong tree, and should be doing something else.

On that we agree.