Messenger Comparison

in Informationwar3 years ago

image.png

A friendly reminder that there is only one messenger out there which ticks all but the last two boxes.

And those two boxes are, as the author rightfully points out: placebos. You can remote delete the message — but you can't delete the screenshot the receiver made.

Threema is also the only one which is not “free of charge”. So you have to ask yourself: Is your privacy and security worth a one time payment of $5?

https://threema.ch/en/messenger-comparison

Sort:  

Congratulations @vermithrax! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :

You published more than 700 posts.
Your next target is to reach 750 posts.

You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP

So, for people who haven't read the article - what makes Threema useful? Removing a post, I find, is only marginally useful.

What would be best would be that the data is encrypted; that the user would have a private key and the account not tied to a real-world tracking device - like a phone.

  • Threema encrypts all communication including group chats. And not just “secure chats”.
  • Threema uses as little meta data as possible.
  • Threema is not US based.

I like Signal but just like it and telegram I wonder if they are really being forthcoming about the security. I mean, I'm not a tech guy, but these companies have to make money right? So where are they making any if they are not selling some of our data? There's no such thing as a free lunch!

Well for Threema the answer is easy: You pay them $5. Just once.

Threema also has Threema Work which is more expensive and will make them more money.

No surprise that Threema also prides itself in not collection meta data.

image.png

oooh, i love that quote. I'm gonna save that. Thanks