Consciousness without a mind

in Photography3 years ago

The questions of being, consciousness and reality are beginning to bother me again. Sometimes it seems that I am asking some frivolous, insignificant or even banal questions....But then I cut off these thoughts, because I wanted to spit on the opinions of others. Self–development is a personal individual single path.

image.png

Now to the questions that bother me. About space and memory code.

I claimed that a certain memory code is written to each photo.

And is it possible to capture a memory code, a state code, even if it is just a monotonous sky, or monotonous snow, or any other image that does not represent any artistic value and does not represent an image of anything at all (terrain, object, subject, etc.)?

Where is the limit of the possibility of writing the memory code to a snapshot?

Yes, I can't answer these questions yet, since I haven't conducted experiments yet.

If you remember the graphics where everything merges into one pattern, then it already has a memory code.

By the memory code, I understand not the event itself in detail, but the frequency of vibrations at the time of taking the picture, the state of mind, mood, the smell of time.

And with the help of this frequency, if you get into it, you can already remember some events of that time, not necessarily even at the time of taking the picture.

So if I shoot pure white or maximally monochrome photographic canvases, will something be recorded in them?

It seems to me that something will work for the author of the pictures, but most likely it will not work for the viewer.

In general, the memory code is individual for each viewer. Everyone can have their own associations.

It will depend on who is on what frequency at the time of viewing.

There are many layers, layers of frequencies, memory codes in photography, and someone can feel something similar to the feelings of the author, and someone will pick up something of their own.

Not staged shots work especially well.

Why did I come to the genres of non-staged photography?

Yes, because when a picture is "staged", created, it is made by a person.

And everything that is done by chance, not put on purpose by the mind, is done without the mind, that is, by the soul.

And she, in turn, always acts as a medium with something more subtle, higher, beyond understanding.

And if I think about one thing while pressing the button, then later, looking at the finished picture, I find a lot of other things.

This all greatly affects the snapshot memory code.

The so-called keys, elements that are a conductor to that frequency.

I don't even know which way to go to come to this and whether something needs to go through.

It seems to me that you need to bring yourself to a certain frequency, to a world without a mind, where you don't have to think, but you need to surrender to space and it will give you stories by itself.

Anyone who brings his consciousness to such a state will be able to do this.

You can not know any rules, not learn for years how to shoot correctly – there are many examples when a person takes a camera and immediately shoots well. This is not a talent, but a level of consciousness.

Sort:  

I'm not familiar with a photography, waves and highlights.
But about the flow of human consciousness, you are very close to the truth.
In order to open up to the new and intangible, it is necessary to turn off the internal dialogue and surrender to the flow of perception at the level of emotions and sensations, and then the flow of information will be cleared of excess noise and the unknown will open

Thank you for feedback!