A few giveaway posts here and there should be accepted, but when it's the main thing people do I'd rather see them forfeit author rewards because they shouldn't be profitable. It just extracts value from hive stakeholders without putting in any effort to give some meaning to the rewards, thus they're easily traded off for something else cause you got them for close to no effort/time investment.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Sure i completely understand and agree. I just wanted to point out that there are many other schemes beside giveaways with a repetitive pattern (and if it is token based you even get votes from your "investors").
yeah, like eds or hsbi, they're hard to tackle however, you're the asshole if you start downvoting people while the projects aren't that much affected themselves as they've already gotten paid. They're also very spread out already so you'd have to start downvoting thousands of users potentially. I don't think they even let people sell their hsbi tokens back to then but not sure about that. All we can do for now is track and downvote the most extreme cases of low effort content since they themselves don't bother doing any curation.
I like that i can discuss this with you an non emotional manner. I would not condemn anyone who tries things out on the chain. It is in my opinion just normal. It evolves with the people and people evolve too. at the end it is still all up to the stakeholders.