I don't think anything in what you have said above in any way diminishes Elon Musk's extraordinary achievements and contribution to humanity.
Indeed everything you describe above is just typical business. Everyone who is in business has co-founders, sometimes falls out with them, sometimes ousts them and claims credit.
To suggest that geniuses don't have failures or crash cars is ridiculous and completely misunderstands the nature of entrepreneurship, capitalism and human nature.
All successful entrepreneurs have failures, often many. The good ones learn from their failures and go onto success.
Musk is actively opposing the agenda 2030 globalists and supporting free speech against dangerous and difficult opposition. He has exposed the COVID tyranny and the dangers of the jab like no other major figure.
He is also promoting a positive future for humanity (expansion into the solar system and its unlimited resources) rather than the dangerous Malthusian agenda of the Davos elites.
If it were not for a few brave people like Musk, the Davos Malthusian Censorious Globalists would have already won.
Musk has his own very explicit agenda that guides everything he does - making humans a multi-planetary species.
Musk has self-admitted having Aspergers Syndrome which explains his sometimes a bit crazy behaviour. He is not perfect and may exagerate and "Elon Time" is a well known phenomenon, but in the end he often delivers the most extraordinary contributions to humanity of any living person.
If you oppose the Davos globalist agenda then you need to support allies like Musk even if you don't agree with everything he does.
Musk has recently put a WEF puppet as CEO of Twitter. That's not anti establishment to me at all.
There is no evidence she is a WEF puppet.
She certainly comes from the MSM advertising establishment, but that does not mean she is a WEF puppet.
Musk needed an experienced CEO who could restore mainstream advertisers's spending on Twitter.
It was inevitable that any such experienced person would have pushed the WEF agenda of the MSM in their previous role to some extent. She was also appointed to a role by Trump so has played both sides.
But Musk made it quite clear what his position was regarding advertiser influence in his interview with her - advertisers can chose what content to be associated with but can't decide what is allowed on Twitter.
She came on board on that basis and Musk is the boss.
She and Musk need to be judged by what happens at Twitter going forward.
Musk has made huge strides at Twitter for free speech and exposing illegal, hidden government censorship etc.
How about some appreciation and gratefulness for all Musk has done rather than pre-judging his hiring decisions.
I have appreciation for what he's done with Twitter but there's a lot of mist around him and he oftentimes contradicts himself.
Regarding the CEO of Twitter, if she wasn't a puppet she would have no place at WEF. Will do more research into her once I get on my laptop.