RE: As usual people voted for the TITLE of a bill that does the OPPOSITE of what the title says.

So you understand that printing money causes inflation, that therefore its not reducing inflation, and you're saying that you don't know if it causes inflation because you don't know the reasoning behind it. Do you suggest that you'll find any kind of reasoning in a bill, or that it's contents change the consequences of that amount of freely printed fiat on inflation, or even more, that there exists any reasoning which would make the definition of inflation invalid or otherwise incorrect? Because if you can't weigh the matter on it's basic facts of what inflation is caused by you can't expect that anything more will make sense, but I don't think you're interested, only a troll.