The UN, the voice of Criminals.

Souce
During the last weeks we have seen the attempts of international organizations to try to sexualize children, now an alarming report has come out that is sponsored by the UN that in a certain way opens the legal channels to decriminalize pedophilia in various countries.

Souce Ian Seiderman, ICJ Director of Law and Policy
According to "UN experts" criminalizing crimes related to this issue constitutes an attack on Human Rights, more of the same, "criminal law is one of the harshest tools that the state exposes to exercise control over people, as such it should be a measure of last resort" this is written by Ian Seiderman who is director of law and policy of the International Court of Justice and in that same press release It establishes that it must be recognized that these laws did not only see Human Rights but the fundamental principles themselves.
Souce
As you can see here at Hive there are also many accounts financed by globalist elites that prevent free thought!
As proof of this, the negative votes.
I am no fan of the UN, but I just read section 16 of that document and you have misinterpreted it's content. The 'legal technicalities' in that section are actually pretty straightforward English words to describe the situation. In essence, the document points out that not all jurisdictions have the same rules about the age of sexual consent and so a 'truly correct age of consent' would have to take into consideration the thoughts/desires of the millions of young people involved - who do not all think the same. This is simple respect for free will and without it we have only pure evil on Earth.
The UK law sets 16 as the heterosexual age of consent - other places have it at 18 and so on - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_consent.
Also, it seems that some countries set different age limits for homosexual sex to heterosexual sex - the report is basically saying that that is unfair.
Nowhere does the document mention having sex with anyone under the age of consent in any nations that are considered 'developed'.
Ultimately, whenever organisations try to control other people against their will, they engage in evil - regardless of their intentions - so there is no good way to go about what they are trying to do - regardless of what they are trying to do.
In the cases where we can generally agree that some kind of consensus on the protection of more vulnerable people is a good idea - there will always be disagreements over what is the correct limit to be imposed. However, I think in this case you are projecting your own beliefs and essentially accusing people of being child abusers based on a document that simply doesn't present evidence of that being the case.
Thanks for your comment.
I am going to make a publication of the gender laws approved and in force in Spain, promoted by its exemplary minister who follows the UN guidelines, I await your comment!