Many thanks, I think you have made some important points here.
After what I have researched and read and heard over the last years, and in particular over the last months, I have come to the conclusion anyway that there has never been any really long-term and detailed documentation of vaccination damage in the history of vaccination and that the entire population has always been considered a testing ground.
It is extremely difficult to prove monocausality, in both directions.
I always think of the example of the death of bees, which have been said to be dying en masse and which environmentalists have suspected to be caused by the pesticides sprayed on fruit plants. But the companies that produce the pesticides have an easy job of insisting that there must be unconditional proof that the pesticides are harmful and that there are no other causes of bee mortality. To the extent that laboratory tests seek to prove this, it can be argued that they are just laboratory tests and not field research. However, if you do field research, you will find that you are actually dealing with such multiple factors that it is difficult to provide monocausal proof.
So we are dealing with the same problem again and again. Where laboratory research is carried out and then claims to have found something useful and effective, it may be brought to market if sufficient scientific consensus has been reached. Without long-term field research results; because what does long-term actually mean?
But now there is a difference between whether something is brought actively into play by technology. Or whether it is a phenomenon not influenced by man. For example, flu is one such phenomenon that we have been living with for a long time without panicking about it.
You rely on the fact that you would notice it if there was a sudden excess mortality or serious problems. At least that is what we understood by normality. We let events happen and then we act on them locally and with reason.
To live in a world where everyone is always suspicious, constantly monitoring each other, trying to avoid any harm, what is the gain? Certainly not a relaxed and spontaneous life. Where getting ill and dying is declared a taboo, the prolongation of this lifestyle is, in my opinion, not a quality but rather a torture.
I have never had the idea of blaming anyone for getting the flu. Nor do I want to start doing so. We harm each other in a social and mental way when we insist on this rigid monitoring and distrust.
Greetings to you.