I went to your private blog-site and read about vaccines. Thank you, it touches the very topic I was thinking about in the last months, as also I was thinking about taking blood-samples before all this happened and asked myself: How can people be so sure about what they see in a blood-sample outside of the complexity of the body and whether it will show the exact same reactions inside of the body? The entire unique system is absent, so what do scientists expect to learn?
This would be like trying to explain weather events outside planet Earth to a child by isolating a storm from its planetary environment and then making attempts to influence the storm. Without considering that the isolation itself is the first and most significant influence. Which can distort all further results, even if some findings fall away in the process.
But just as you can't isolate a storm from its planetary occurrence, you can't isolate a virus, that's how I see it by now, and that makes the whole debate about the myth of protective medical measures superfluous. The fact that the processes in the body are so much more complex, cleverer and also astonishing is forgotten by the analytical mind, which can only separate but not reassemble.
Deep down I think that diseases are not cured by mostly medical interventions (surgery or medicines given to the body) but by given rest, a better environment, mental and bodily peace, good food, good company and mostly time to heal and recover. Non intervention, waiting and seeing, that seems to be forgotten by people. Only, if waiting and watching does not cure, only if a human feels urgent need for more invasive methods, one still could use them, if so wished for.
.
Germ theory is a con and the sickness industry create customers by any means possible