(Photos - Credit: Candace Owens)
It's now been over a month since the public assassination of Charlie Kirk on September 10th, but the energetic shock-wave that rippled out in the wake of that horrific tragedy is still reverberating through the collective human consciousness, and may well continue to do so for many more weeks and perhaps months to come. The whole nation felt it at some level, the trauma of seeing a fellow American and human being brutally and publicly executed while speaking to a crowd of onlookers at a Utah university, the gruesome scene of the murder live-streamed for the whole world to see. At the energetic level, something massive shifted that day, and though this abhorrent act of darkness was itself clearly a blatantly negative action, it appears that Charlie's death nevertheless somehow managed to trigger a massive positive energetic shift in the collective human consciousness. In weaving together this comprehensive deep dive, my aim was to explore the nature of this event and the shift it triggered from a deeper, more spiritual perspective than many others, sharing much of the insight I’ve personally gained into this uniquely catalyzing and intriguing multi-faceted story.
Fruit of the Divisive Polarization Agenda Tearing our Nation Apart, Catalyst for Unity
The Dark Side of course immediately jumped to utilize this tragedy to further sow the seeds of fear, hatred and division amongst us, as the establishment system of control always does with every major corporate news headline in its bid to control and enslave humanity. So it is that those identified with both the left and the right sought to capitalize on this human tragedy for their own selfish political purposes, the left-right two-party political paradigm being one of the most prominent and powerful tools weaponized against Americans by the forces of darkness operating on our planet.
The hate spewed against Charlie among many of those on the left was pervasive in the days following his death, with some even celebrating his murder. The right, meanwhile, sought to depict the assassination exclusively as a result of the rise of 'radical leftist terrorism' supported by the Democratic 'elite', and the entire political right-wing as the party of peace and the good guys. Both divisive narratives played right into the Divide and Conquer strategy of the establishment system of control.
Insanity from the left...
Across social media, there was a wave of diatribes of seemingly mindless hate directed at Charlie, as if to justify or downplay his gruesome public assassination. Among these accusations were that Charlie was a racist, bigoted, misogynist, homophobic, transphobic, Islamophobic, Nazi, genocide apologist, etc, etc, etc. Below are just a few examples among many such social media posts, all sharing the racist accusation.
He was allegedly "an evil and dangerous person, the absolute worst of the worst," despite he and his platform consistently and frequently facilitating dialogue between those of differing political views, and despite never calling for violence against those fellow Americans with whom he disagreed:
Being a longtime supporter of Israel he was allegedly “a whole genocide apologist,” also “anti anything human rights” despite consistently championing the basic human rights to life and free speech, and was naturally also “very racist,” because apparently pretty much everyone in that particular camp is utterly convinced this claim is true.
X User @queenadeIeslays was frustrated that some people out there believe we should have empathy for Charlie in the wake of his untimely death, primarily because he "supported the genocide" and Israeli slaughter of Palestinian civilians it would seem, describing such compassionate souls as "a lost cause!"
Now I at least understand and empathize with those who, out of compassion for the suffering of humanity, take issue with Charlie’s support of Israel during its blatant, two-year, US-sponsored genocide of Palestinians in Gaza. I, too, took issue with that stance, though I can also see that this former stance of his was radically shifting in the final months of his life on earth. Perhaps many of those accusing Charlie of supporting the genocide and defending the senseless slaughter of children in Gaza are simply ignorant of this fact, that in the final months of his life the death and suffering of innocents in Gaza - particularly the children - weighed heavy on his heart, and that his support of Israel was quickly diminishing as a result, and that he publicly questioned and criticized Israeli policy in a number of ways on multiple occasions.
Charlie's shifting stance on Israel
In a podcast interview on October 12, 2023, all the way back at the very beginning of the war, not only did he publicly warn that Israel’s war campaign would be an “ethnic cleansing” of Gaza, but went so far as to seriously question the official October 7 narrative, suggesting there may have been an Israeli stand-down order leading to the high casualty rate of Israelis used as the pretext for the two-year-and-counting genocidal ethnic cleansing campaign.
This was while Charlie was still 100% pro-Israel, and before the genocidal results of the war began to be increasingly obvious for all to see. It was this open-mindedness and willingness to question even the same state of Israel that his own deeply held religious beliefs taught him were 'God's chosen', which ultimately led to what Candace Owens describes as the "spiritual transformation" culminating in his defection from the Zionist pro-Israel ranks of American politics just two days before he was assassinated.
As his public support of Israel began to waver in recent months, Charlie suggested that Jeffrey Epstein was, as evidence suggests, working for the Israeli Mossad, even publicly defying Trump by challenging the President to release the Epstein files as he once promised but now refuses to do. He also began to question and push back against the Zionist influence and control of American media, publicly venting his anger at being attacked by Zionists within the pro-Israel lobby simply for asking relevant questions that most Americans are beginning to ask, and engaging with America-first conservatives who are critical of Israeli policy and Zionist influence over this nation.
“I have less ability… to criticize the Israeli government than actual Israelis do. And that’s really, really weird.”
After all, Charlie was in recent months before his death also giving a platform to and engaging with notoriously popular anti-Israel voices such as comedian Dave Smith and newscaster Tucker Carlson, which infuriated his Zionist donors and handlers to no end.
Perhaps most notably of all, Tucker Carlson has since revealed in an interview with Megyn Kelly that Charlie even paid Donald Trump a personal visit at the White House over the summer in a bold move to lobby the President against joining Israel's war on Iran, in complete defiance of Israeli PM Netanyahu and his own Zionist donors.
In fact, just 48 hours before his assassination, Charlie even announced in writing, in a group text thread that has since been made public by Candace Owens and confirmed as authentic by Turning Point spokesman Andrew Kolvett, that due to bullying by the Israeli lobby ("Jewish donors"), he was forced to abandon the pro-Israel cause.
After venting his frustration at losing yet another Zionist donor of $2 million a year over his refusal to "cancel Tucker" - the single largest and most popular independent conservative media voice in America - and stating that he was "thinking of inviting" the staunchly anti-Israel conservative media personality Candance Owens; Charlie made the unequivocal declaration that: "I cannot and will not be bullied like this. Leaving me no choice but to leave the pro-Israel cause."
That so many prominent pro-Israel voices such as Laura Loomer for days vehemently denied Candace's initial claims that Charlie had made these statements, is probably worth noting. That one of these prominent voices of denial was also one of those Zionist influencers closest to Charlie who also happened to be one of the eight people actually on that text thread and thus privy to this decision, is highly suspect and surely worth looking deeper into...
And when Candace finally did release the proof, Zionist players close to Charlie who clearly appear to have betrayed him were shown to be the deceptive liars that they truly are, while those attempting to cling to the false narrative they had for so long been parroting were made to look like the propaganda tools that they are...
This Zionist bullying over hosting Tucker Carlson appears to have simply been the final nail in the coffin of Charlie's support for "the pro-Israel cause," and the declaration that followed as a result of it the culmination of an intense inner struggle underlying a major shift he'd been going through for months now. Charlie was, like so many of his own supporters and fellow American Christian Zionists, questioning his once staunch support for genocidal Israel as he traversed a difficult journey of awakening. Charlie was quite clearly in the process of awakening to the truly dark and evil nature of the secular state of Israel, the Zionist ideology of hate and supremacism underlying it, and the Israel lobby's influence and control over US media and politics.
We may never know exactly how far along this awakening journey he truly was, but it is undeniable that he was far enough along to make the groundbreaking decision to "leave the pro-Israel cause." And it was this documented choice to abandon the pro-Israel cause he had once so proudly championed that so many millions of Americans naturally now see as the most likely and obvious motive behind his assassination...
Indeed, long before the text-message evidence of this controversial decision of Charlie’s was made public, red flags suggesting a wider conspiracy and cover-up abounded. In an early report covering the ridiculous nature of the ‘official’ narrative of the Charlie Kirk assassination, independent newscaster Kim Iversen explains why the vast majority of freethinking Americans were from the very start questioning and refusing to blindly accept such an implausible and nonsensical narrative as the one offered up by the establishment:
This radical shift away from supporting "the pro-Israel cause" that Charlie was undeniably undergoing, his refusal to accept Israeli PM Netanyahu's funding offer (bribe) aimed at keeping him in the Zionist fold, as well as his fears of the pro-Israel forces around him were all documented in the immediate aftermath of his death in a highly illuminating piece written by independent journalists Max Blumenthal and Anya Parampil, published at The GrayZone.
And if Charlie's pivot away from his previous support of genocidal Israel was almost immediately obvious to numerous left-wing journalists and commentators - from Max Blumenthal to The Young Turks to Jimmy Dore - then it would seem that only ignorance can be to blame for the host of leftist social media warriors out there spewing the nonsense that Charlie should receive no empathy and perhaps even deserved to die because of his unwavering support for Israeli genocide. The indoctrination of those still plugged into the matrix programming is surely to blame for such ignorance, ignorance that's responsible for breeding such blind hatred as that being spewed by so many in the days and weeks following the assassination of Charlie Kirk.
Humanity needs empathy, not ignorance
But even if this man were truly as vile and hateful and cold-hearted as such social media posts would have the world believe, he would nevertheless still remain a fellow human being just like the rest of us; deserving of all the same human rights, compassion, and empathy that each one of us expects and deserves as a living, breathing, sentient human being upon this planet. After all, each one of us has our own unique set of thoughts, feelings, traumas, desires, strengths, weaknesses, beliefs, worldviews and childhood programming - childhood programming that shapes our beliefs, worldviews and such in this crazy world - and Charlie was no exception.
So in response to those mocking the millions of thoughtful Americans who prayed for Charlie and encouraged empathy rather than hate in the wake of his assassination, regardless of their own political views: No, we are not "supposed to have empathy for him because a bunch of white americans idolized him." We should rather have empathy for him simply because he was a fellow human being just like us, heavily programmed and indoctrinated from his youth into a particular set of beliefs just like the rest of us, and who cared deeply about his friends and loved ones, just like the rest of us. We should have empathy because he was violently taken from this earth and ripped from his friends and family, because he was killed in cold blood despite not being engaged in violence himself but rather in dialogue and debate.
You see, this is the problem with the polarizing programming in America right now, that it is being used to subtly and in some cases even overtly dehumanize anyone and everyone we disagree with. And that level of polarization leads us straight into this downward spiraling cycle of bitter hate and division that leads us nowhere but here, into this dark abyss ruled by fear, hate, dehumanization and violence.
I don't see a racist here...
Of all the hateful accusations laid out against Charlie, the one I find the most nonsensical also ironically appears to be the most pervasive, that Charlie Kirk was a racist. But in answer to this I must ask: What man who is truly a racist or white supremacist among us actually has close friends who are black? And how is it that this supposedly racist hater of women was close friends with not only black Americans, but a black woman to boot? Can anyone in their right mind see a racist in this picture?
As it turns out, despite personally disagreeing with a great many of Charlie's political views, I have managed to find one such view on which I am in very firm agreement, a view which also adds to the absurdity of the claim that this man was in fact a racist: The scientifically supported view that race based upon skin color and used to divide the one and only single race of humanity - the human race - is an illusory social construct; which, by the way, Charlie also clearly stated he was trying to break us all free from.
Now, did Charlie say some pretty ignorant things at times? I certainly think so, as do most of us humans at some point in our lives believe and repeat some pretty ignorant nonsense. Did he sow division with some of his most inflammatory statements? It certainly would appear that way. But does that make him 'evil' to the core and deserving to be violently murdered for these so-called 'radical' and at times absolutely politically incorrect beliefs? Well, for all those who truly believe in free speech and human equality, the answer is obviously no. And those who would answer yes are the same double minded souls who believe violence is both justified and good, even deserving of praise when carried out against the enemy and the 'bad guys', but a totally unjustified evil deserving of punishment when carried out against themselves...
Mocking a dead man and celebrating the cold-blooded murder of a nonviolent activist...
A number of others mocked Charlie's death, with countless posts making fun of the fact that someone who defended Americans' right to keep and bear arms was killed by one of the very guns he supported private ownership of. And no matter one's reasoning and beliefs, it takes an utterly sick and depraved mind for one human being to plaster smiley face emojis on images of a public assassination of a fellow human being engaged in peaceful dialogue, just because that one disagrees with the political and/or religious views and beliefs of the one brutally murdered and violently taken from his friends and family, and indeed from us all.
![Screenshot 2025-10-23 at 09-40-49 だーすー@OORer on X charlie kirk got shot with the same guns he was advocating for claiming all the yearly deaths from gun violence is “worth it” to keep the 2nd amendment on top of being racist [...].png](https://images.hive.blog/768x0/https://files.peakd.com/file/peakd-hive/jasonliberty/23qrYeLWWrAZ8KWePS7coRz6yP1jLGwWT4UzTfhTN9qqusDMjrQJjwQ6HurZp1iTHeVXp.png)
(~~~ embed:1966193666898420170) twitter metadata:b29yZXIwMDdkYXx8aHR0cHM6Ly90d2l0dGVyLmNvbS9vb3JlcjAwN2RhL3N0YXR1cy8xOTY2MTkzNjY2ODk4NDIwMTcwKXw= ~~~
That such posts were far from isolated is a sad reality, however their popularity seems to highlight that they are by no means representative of the views of the majority, and the possibility should not be ruled out that some number of such mindless posts are in fact bots and not human beings at all, or paid agents of chaos... As an example suggestive of this theory, we can see a word-for-word identical post to the one above from an entirely different account, both of which have an incredibly high ratio of views to likes, perhaps suggesting a manufactured view boosting with the algorithms, and certainly showing how few of those viewing this drivel actually support the hate it is designed to foment.
Nevertheless, there is clearly a sizeable number of real people who actually downplayed, mocked and in some cases outright celebrated the murder of Charlie Kirk - not just online, but also out in the 'real world'. One such woman was caught on film at a 'No King's Day' protest just this last weekend, clearly appearing to publicly mock Charlie's assassination as she put her fingers to her neck in the form of a gun while mouthing what looks to be the word 'bang'...
And as it turns out, this poor soul even appears to have been identified as a Chicago elementary school teacher, which school then appears to have immediately shut down their website and X page in the wake of this discovery - presumably a move aimed at avoiding further embarrassment and hiding the truth of the matter from further investigation...
Meanwhile, the following X post noting the "evil" nature of celebrating the murder of a fellow American features a video compilation highlighting just a few of those sad souls who took to social media in the wake of Charlie's assassination to celebrate his death. There are many more such videos than those included here, but this should suffice to demonstrate that such celebrations were both real and not isolated to merely a single case or two, rather being a whole trend among an entire segment - albeit a minority - of society...
And while I agree with the poster's assessment that such behavior is absolutely unconscionable - regardless, by the way, of whether the one whose murder is being celebrated was a lover of America and champion of Christian values - I absolutely reject the message of the video title/caption embedded into the video by its original creator - "Liberals in a nutshell" - because such vile behavior as this is in fact only representative of far left extremism and not the majority of those who identify themselves as liberals as this caption deceptively insinuates. The fact of the matter is that a great many self-identified liberals are actually quite kind and decent human beings who never celebrated, mocked or found any joy in the death of Charlie Kirk whatsoever, despite finding many of his political views utterly despicable and repugnant. Such attempts to paint the entire American left with the far-left extremist ideology which only represents an extremist minority is both disingenuous and revealing of the extremely polarized state of the nation.
This just goes to show that both 'sides' of the two-party paradigm are unwittingly fueling the polarization, even those who are in fact not the extremists themselves, and even if only in subtle ways that most are perhaps not even conscious of. This deep collective darkness must be brought into the light in order to be seen and healed, but it is unfortunate that the majority of those highlighting such hate are themselves feeding into the same divisive hatred by refusing to see these 'enemies' through the eyes of love. If we are to reverse this cycle, we must begin extending compassion and empathy even and especially to those spewing all of the hatred and ignorance, for they are those who need it most.
Insanity from the right...
Meanwhile, Fox News, as the corporate mouthpiece of the political right, intentionally fuels this disingenuous and deceptive narrative that depicts the democrats as the violent, extremist 'bad guys', and republicans as the peaceful, rational 'good guys'.
In the right-wing establishment propaganda piece - Experts warn leftist celebrations of Charlie Kirk's death signal a dangerous mainstream shift in politics, Fox News cites a number of 'experts' in the field to paint the above-described divisive picture they want their cult of readers and viewers to see and hear. Just one such glaring example follows.
"They call us Nazis, fascists, and threats to democracy. In the wake of George Floyd, the left burned down cities and businesses," Lauren said.
"Since Charlie’s assassination, conservatives have gathered in churches and peaceful prayer. [That] tells you all you need to know."
I'm sorry if you genuinely believe this to be true, Link Lauren, but no, that absolutely does not tell us all we need to know, not even close. Do you listen to the names the extremists on the right call democrats? Because they are equally inflammatory, and in some cases even the same exact labels! The hate goes both ways, and those who can't see this reality are woefully ignorant, likely not even looking...
How many of those same conservatives who gathered in peaceful prayer following Charlie’s assassination have strongly supported and defended the genocidal wholesale slaughter of Palestinians in Gaza by the Israeli war machine that Trump and the entire political right, save Representatives Thomas Massie and Marjarie Taylor Green, have been supporting for two long years? Because among those same conservatives must necessarily be diehard Christian Zionist supporters of Israel just like Charlie once was, whose blind support for and defense of Israel for these past two years during a blatant, live-streamed genocide belies the claims and insinuations of this being the ‘party of peace’. After all, it is well established that the Christian Zionist right is the backbone of the US political support for Israel, without which voter base the pro-Israel lobby could no longer maintain its stranglehold on the largely Zionist-owed US political system.
Of course it is also true that the size of this voter base is greatly diminishing, with the amount of Christian support for the state of Israel falling sharply during this two-year genocidal onslaught on Gaza. Perhaps even millions of American Christians who once pledged allegiance to Israel - just like Charlie, Tucker and Candace once did - have undergone similar transformations to the one Charlie was going through in the months prior to his assassination. Indeed, it would even seem based upon countless social media comments that the vast majority of Charlie Kirk's own supporters have largely become staunchly anti-Israel at this point. Just browse the comments under the YouTube video of the Josh Hammer Vs. Dave Smith debate hosted by Charlie back in July, and you will be able to see exactly what I mean...
Meanwhile, the system wants us to believe that one of the two establishment parties is the party of peace, and the other is the party of war and violence, when in reality both parties are equally supporters of political violence in one form or another. For there is no bigger and deadlier reflection of political violence that exists, than in the form of violent war waged on the battlefields of the earth. And the entire establishment government system, left and right, support and sponsor political violence in the form of the wars they endorse, defend, fund and arm. This imperial paradigm fueling endless, perpetual war across the planet is much thanks to the deeply entrenched and highly intrusive control of the US political establishment by the American Military Industrial Complex from within, and the Zionist state of Israel via the Israeli lobby from without.
These days, the democrat politicians generally 'stand with Ukraine', wholeheartedly supporting the US-sponsored proxy war against Russia; while the republican politicians generally 'stand with Israel', wholeheartedly supporting the US-sponsored genocide of Gaza and ethnic cleansing of all of Palestine. Meanwhile, the majority of Americans just like the majority of humans on Planet Earth at this time simply want peace, and strongly oppose US support of Israel and its genocidal war on Gaza in particular.
Semantics aside, and popular support be damned, the US government under both democratic and republican leadership has in recent years funded both of these deadly and unpopular wars, with trillions in taxpayer dollars and weapons flowing endlessly into Ukraine and Israel alike. So the genocidal slaughter disproportionately targeting Palestinian children in Gaza rages on as US bombs continue to slaughter unarmed civilians and level civilian infrastructure, no matter which party is in power. This, even while thousands upon thousands of Ukrainians who are sick and tired of their own war are continuously being drafted into service against their will in order to be sacrificed to the demons of darkness upon the bloody alters of the battlefield, offered up to the modern gods of war in exchange for money and power with the full support of the psychopathic leaders of the US.
Those who claim that the rise of political violence in this country is to be blamed on either the left or the right while insisting that they and not the other is the party of peace, are either willfully or ignorantly deceiving you. For it is the very same system comprised of both establishment parties which is the true source of all this political violence, as well as the extreme polarization contributing to its increasing rise here in America and across the world stage.
But despite the Babylon system's best attempts to divide and conquer the masses, the People are increasingly waking up to the grand deception and refusing to play into their sick games fueled by and also fueling all of this rampant fear and hatred.
The Truth is Rising
Because at the end of the day, whether one agrees with, disagrees with, or is relatively neutral or indifferent about Charlie's political and religious views and beliefs he espoused as a part of his activism; he was still first and foremost a fellow human being, a family man, and a friend to many. And although this undeniable fact seems to have been missed by all too many of those caught up in the heat of the moment, it cannot ultimately be denied; because this truth, being a very part of our being, is known by all of us at a deep and primal level within us. And one way or another, regardless of how long it may take, truth always prevails over deception. So while both 'sides' of the one establishment system played the political blame game and spun the assassination of Charlie Kirk in such a way to advance their own divide and conquer agenda, the entire nation was collectively being forced to recognize the natural results of this cleverly manufactured political polarization that's been sweeping the nation like a plague over the past several years: The rise of bitter hatred, unnatural fear, and increasing violence both at home and abroad.
Charlie's assassination served as a massive wake up call, mirroring back to humanity a reflection of her current collective state of consciousness, and that image isn't pretty because the fruit of the choice for fear and hatred is quite ugly indeed. And while the establishment sought to use this tragedy to further polarize America, the truth is nevertheless out there for all to see, even within the ranks of the establishment itself to some extent. For example, scholar Arie Perliger of the University of Massachusetts Lowell, in an interview at The Conversation, "spoke bluntly" - not about the alleged rise in 'radical leftist violence and domestic terrorism' or 'right-wing hate and racism' - but about the bigger problem fueling these both: "political polarization in the United States."
What’s different now is we see an increased support in political violence from both sides of the political spectrum. Consistently, almost a quarter of the public is willing to support political violence in some form, or see that as a legitimate form of political action.
And as we see an increased political polarization, and the increased demonization of political rivals, we see the decline and disappearance of political discourse and policymaking. The bipartisan political process in Congress in the past few years has been almost nonexistent. And that spills over to the public, where the other (political) side is seen as a one-dimensional figure that is a threat.
So we see that, just as the polarization we are witnessing has led to a decrease in political discourse in America, so is political discourse the solution to this problem rather than the childish mud-slinging and petty attacks we’ve all become so accustomed to regularly witnessing on the political stage. And if there was one thing that Charlie consistently stood for, and was great at, it was encouraging, facilitating and engaging in respectful political discourse and debate among people on various sides of a whole host of issues. And for that reason and that reason alone, we can confidently state that Charlie Kirk was a powerful force for unity in this deeply divided nation, no matter how divisive he simultaneously may have also appeared to have been.
And although many didn’t recognize or appreciate this uniquely positive function of Charlie during his physical life on earth, myself included; a great many of us are now in the wake of his death recognizing that key role of uniting a bitterly divided humanity that he is playing - and perhaps far more powerfully so after his death than before that fateful day.
As one X user's popular post accurately points out:
"They Manufacture Hate. They Want Civil War. Don’t Take the Bait."
Indeed, I don't think the truth could have been better said than this:
"We honor Charlie best not by mirroring their darkness, but by refusing their trap and summoning our better angels."
This is, I believe, exactly what Charlie would have wanted, this heart of his reflected in the simple words shared with an acquaintance of his, in what ended up being his final words to a man who also happens to be a close personal friend of mine: "Blessed are the peacemakers."
And this message of truth and unity is, I think, also at the heart of the massive energetic shift that Charlie's assassination for some reason triggered. It is certainly the message that all too many in this world are in need of, shared so well by intuitive and spiritual teacher Amanda Ellis, in her heartfelt reflections upon this "watershed moment" of human history:
An energetic tidal wave, frequency shift sweeps the planet
Countless thousands felt the powerful energetic shift in the aftermath of Charlie’s death in one way or another, and I was no exception.
As I described in my last post, I have come to consider myself empathic in the sense that I sometimes feel the energy of others, particularly emotional energy; although unless it is a very massive collective event such as the suffering in Gaza taking place as a result of the genocide there, I typically only pick up on the energy of those I am close to or in close physical proximity with. So when I began to feel waves of intense grief wash over me in the wake of Charlie’s death, despite having no emotional attachment to him whatsoever, I immediately felt pretty strongly that something was unique about this particular murder. After all, I didn’t personally know the man, I wasn’t a follower of him or his work, and had only seen him speak once in a video interview I stumbled across in the months before his death. Apart from that single video, I only knew Charlie through the good friend of mine in Montana who personally knew him, the same friend who sent me the ‘blessed are the peacemakers’ text shared above.
And yet here I was in the aftermath of his death randomly crying my eyes out, feeling the sort of grief I would expect to feel if a pet, a friend or a family member had just passed away. Apparently such unexpected and seemingly unwarranted grief was a common phenomenon for many in the wake of Charlie’s assassination. Countless social media comments reveal just how widespread this phenomenon was, also illuminating that many recognized the massive energetic shift that occurred when Charlie’s life was taken. Just a few examples among the many that I’ve personally seen are showcased below.
On top of the grief, a number of people describe feeling a major shift in their lives after Charlie was shot, whether inside or outside of themselves...
One person described feeling the collective opening of many human hearts, now opened to feeling the collective energy that so many were once closed off to.
As it turns out, two of my closest friends, neither of whom describe themselves as typically feeling collective energies, also both described feeling much the same powerful energetic shift that I and so many others were feeling. It is undoubtedly one of the single biggest catalysts for awakening of our time, perhaps second only to the COVID event, having triggered what may well be the most powerful positive collective shift in human consciousness since that time.
It is no wonder that so many see no coincidence in the fact that Charlie’s organization was named Turning Point, for it does indeed appear that his soul has through his death somehow served to trigger a major turning point in humanity...
So many have felt this energetic wave, this collective shift rippling through humanity in the wake of Charlie’s death. We can sense it with all of our being and yet the question of why still lingers. So many deaths every year, so many violent murders, so what is it about Charlie’s assassination that’s so different, and why was this single event so powerful in such a unique way? Lorie Ladd, whose spiritual perspective and overview I particularly resonated with, explains it like this:
Why do I think this this was a pivotal moment for humanity? Because it dropped us into our hearts. It dropped us into the massive dark and light. You saw so many people cheering this death on, being excited about it. It's just showing the more demonic energies that are on the planet. It's bringing to light this spiritual battle and it's bringing humanity to God. Whatever God is to you, it's bringing us to God.
https://www.youtube.com/live/qc80UOrYB7w?si=C4Ph8bR9LoRrezXJ
According to Laurie’s theory, and by challenging one of the system’s most sacred cows, Charlie was pitting himself against some very dark and evil forces attempting to keep him in the system’s fold.
I think he started to come up against absolute evil. And I think this evil and darkness that these people have in them that are running this entire world, they don't want godlike humans beginning to step outside of them and make their own choices. They need them to be a part of their system.
But Charlie was beginning to buck that system, beginning to question and to challenge and to not back down in the face of increasing pressure in various ways and from all around him. He was, in Lorie’s estimation, “a man that was standing for God that would not lay down his sword,” and “no matter what came at him...he wasn’t going to bend for God.” And this, Lorie explains, rather than his particular political views, is why Charlie was targeted, and why he was assassinated in such a graphic and public manner as we witnessed.
And what killed him was that. And it was all of these people and families, Luciferian, demonic, dark families that control all of us...that were going to make an example out of him, so to speak. And they could have killed him in any way. They didn't have to do it the way they did it. It was a sacrifice in front of our eyes. We now had to be a part of their sacrifice that we never wanted to be a part of.
[...]
But the reason I believe this had such an impact, even though a lot of us can't understand the why, it's because they sacrificed somebody in front of our eyes without us asking, in order to claim their truths, in order for them to claim their power, their control, their antichrist type of way.
But just like the COVID event, they have once again overplayed their hand, and what was carried out by forces of darkness for evil purposes has triggered a powerful energetic wave of awakening that cannot and will not be stopped. The darkness reflected on the world stage and within society through the assassination of Charlie Kirk and its aftermath is revealing just how pervasive the fear, the hate, and the deception controlling humanity really is. The inherently deceptive nature of the official narrative of Charlie’s death is so ridiculously and unbelievably absurd that few are buying into it, sparking a massive uniting of human souls from all different backgrounds and beliefs in a quest for the truth of who was actually behind his death. And although we may never know all of the details or specifics, it is becoming increasingly clear to millions of us out there, that this assassination was absolutely in some way orchestrated by ‘them’ - the same dark forces of planetary control that weaponized Charlie’s death against us as a tool used to spread all of the hate, fear, and division.
As Candace Owens put it, concerning who actually killed Charlie: “We don’t know know, but we know.”
Indeed, both intuitively and intellectually, based upon all of the emerging evidence and our own inner guidance, there are so many of us being led to the same general conclusion. And we have little doubt that this was in fact a professional hit coordinated at the highest levels of the powers of darkness operating on our planet, likely also a ritualistic demonic sacrifice of sorts. And one need not go very far down the conspiracy rabbit hole to see that it almost seems as if 'they' went out of their way to make it obvious that this was so. The number of anomalies, coincidences, oddities and demonstrable deception surrounding the details of Charlie's death are far too numerous to unpack here. Suffice it to say, the mathematical probability of all this weirdness being merely coincidental chance is essentially impossible. For those interested in further exploring all this, I highly recommend John St. Julien's eye-opening videos on the subject.
After being guided in meditation to measure the distance from the location of Charlie's assassination to the nearest free masonic site(s), the intriguing discovery John made took him on a journey of inquiry leading him towards the very same conclusion as Lorie, that this tragedy was most likely a public satanic ritual and sacrifice by those sitting at the top of the pyramid structure of planetary control.
And when one factors in a number of fascinating details in the movie Snake Eyes that seem to foreshadow Charlie Kirk’s assassination with an uncanny level of accuracy, and which many have thus suggested is a clear cut case of predictive programming, one cannot help but see that there’s surely more to this story than initially meets the eye.
In many ways, from many angles, and through many different lenses, humanity is being guided into the truth, as the foundation stones of this insidious empire of lies controlling the planet continues to crack and crumble under the weight of its own dark deception. Millions of us there are who can confidently state just as Candace did, that "We don't know know, but we know." We know why Charlie Kirk was put to death, we can feel it in our bones, just as we know why so much of the world was grieving. Perhaps this poem I found posted in the comments of one of John's videos linked above describes this knowing best - By YouTube user @BJBurns888:
I know why my mama’s grieving.
I don't know if she knows why.
I don't know if she knew that she loved him.
Before he lost his life.
But the grief comes from the fact that he didn't lose it.
It was stolen in broad daylight.
In front of everyone.
It was taken by what we call “the Deep State”. The “Shadow Government.” “The Puppeteers.” “The Puppet Masters.” "The Traffickers.” The “Tech Bros.” “The Military Industrial Complex.” “The Medical Industrial Complex.” The Morgans. The Chases. The Rockefellers. The Rothschilds.
“Israel.”
They dropped the gloves.
They dropped the mask.
They reached into his show. And took his life. An American. On American soil.
One shot to the carotid.
Because he refused an invitation.
An offer.
A bribe.
He refused.
They killed him.
Publicly.
In front of everyone.
They know we know.
We're meant to know.
We're meant to know that we best not say “no.”
That's what she's grieving.
I don't know if she knows.
But she knows.
And I think that deep down, on some level within ourselves, we all know. The Dark Side killed Charlie, and it did so by design, with the intention of further fueling the Great American Divide and strengthening the mental chains of fear, ignorance and hatred binding us as slaves in this insidious matrix system of planetary control.
But the deeper meaning and higher purpose of this traumatizing catalyst of an event wasn’t to further fuel the divisive hate and fear that led us here in the first place. Rather, it was to shake us out of our zombie-like state of mental and spiritual sleep, that we would see the ugliness we are becoming as a species and recognize the futility of the choice of fear that we’ve been collectively making for so long, and instead choose its opposite by making the collective choice for love.
That’s what our world desperately needs more of right now, and that’s where this energetic tidal wave sparked by Charlie’s death is taking us. Sure, it might feel at times that those making the choice for peace and love are few and far between, but this is only the illusion cast by the same empire of lies that’s crumbling all around us. It may well be that we are still a minority on this planet, but we are nevertheless a very large minority numbering in the millions, and our numbers are ever growing by the day. We are not alone and we are not few, we who refuse to feed all of the hate and fear as we break free from the chains that bind us. We are here, we are many, and we are choosing peace and love.
"Everybody just hold a vibe;
Take a moment and close your eyes;
Take a breath and help me visualize;
Peace and love." - Jah Sun, Hold a Vibe