Then read the statements. I have tried to be as clear as possible that there are no readily available sources of raw data that will enable you to get causal linkage between vaccinations and adverse events as far as I know: development of that kind of data takes a lot of time. But lack of easy access to data of the type you want is not a license to use available data improperly and call it an analysis.
I start to think we have a language barrier problem. Alternatively, replies that don't convey the information you want to hear are ignored. Based on your responses so far, I am indeed moving towards saying "nothing" to you, as it appears to be a waste of time.
Then read the statements. I have tried to be as clear as possible that there are no readily available sources of raw data that will enable you to get causal linkage between vaccinations and adverse events as far as I know: development of that kind of data takes a lot of time. But lack of easy access to data of the type you want is not a license to use available data improperly and call it an analysis.
So far you say "nothing"?
I start to think we have a language barrier problem. Alternatively, replies that don't convey the information you want to hear are ignored. Based on your responses so far, I am indeed moving towards saying "nothing" to you, as it appears to be a waste of time.
Exactly, also my opinion