Lol, are you memeing yourself here? What exactly am I repeating from what "authority tells me"? And point to specific things, instead of just making blanket statements like above. There's no reasoning with that kind of argument because it doesn't actually address anything I've said. But maybe you just find it a convenient escape from having to rationally argue your position. I'll create a new quote for you to meme in the future: "Blanket memes are the last refuge of the incompetent debator".
You are absolutely incompetent debator: You have a Chinese CDC official who clearly states that virus is not isolated, and you said it’s laughable. So, you believe Chinese CDC but not this official who is out of your prejudice.
You are simply not able to ask yourself if the genome sequencing may be just a computer manipulation? Swallowing anything media serve you? You are not serious. I’m losing my time with you. Good luck.
I'm not saying that the speaker is laughable. And I have no prejudice against the Chinese. Nor do I think the speaker is lying. I think you just don't understand the meaning of what he is saying, because you lack context. I actually read more on this particular interview in the past and the explanation for this soundbite in full context was quite reasonable, but it would take me some time to find it again.
You're weighing the evidence in a laughable manner: you have a "soundbite" from a single scientist, and it is easily misconstrued: the meaning would depend on the context of the conversation and you're weighting that one sound bite higher than 100,000 scientific results.
Lol, are you memeing yourself here? What exactly am I repeating from what "authority tells me"? And point to specific things, instead of just making blanket statements like above. There's no reasoning with that kind of argument because it doesn't actually address anything I've said. But maybe you just find it a convenient escape from having to rationally argue your position. I'll create a new quote for you to meme in the future: "Blanket memes are the last refuge of the incompetent debator".
You are absolutely incompetent debator: You have a Chinese CDC official who clearly states that virus is not isolated, and you said it’s laughable. So, you believe Chinese CDC but not this official who is out of your prejudice.
You are simply not able to ask yourself if the genome sequencing may be just a computer manipulation? Swallowing anything media serve you? You are not serious. I’m losing my time with you. Good luck.
I'm not saying that the speaker is laughable. And I have no prejudice against the Chinese. Nor do I think the speaker is lying. I think you just don't understand the meaning of what he is saying, because you lack context. I actually read more on this particular interview in the past and the explanation for this soundbite in full context was quite reasonable, but it would take me some time to find it again.
You're weighing the evidence in a laughable manner: you have a "soundbite" from a single scientist, and it is easily misconstrued: the meaning would depend on the context of the conversation and you're weighting that one sound bite higher than 100,000 scientific results.
And your idea that all these scientific papers are just "computer manipulation" is purely paranoia. Here's just a few such papers, published on many different sites for scientific research:
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0248371
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7895735/
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2008-3
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/32171191/
https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7023a3.htm
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0243265
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0247799
https://www.publichealthontario.ca/-/media/documents/ncov/epi/covid-19-sars-cov2-whole-genome-sequencing-epi-summary.pdf?la=en
I could go on all day finding articles like this. But you go on believing you understand a single soundbite to mean they are all fake...