You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: DARPA, what are we looking at? [eng/срп] ДАРПА, шта ми то видимо?

in Deep Dives4 years ago (edited)

You didn’t read the text and/or the documents, @patriamreminisci. If you did, you would see that the project was proposed to DARPA in 2018, by the EcoHealth Alliance. Doesn’t have anything with Obama Administration. This is fully Anthony Fauci (and almost certain his Big Pharma bosses) maverick project. The United States does not exist anymore. With the ousting of Trump, corporations have taken over and commit a high treason.

Chinese could not directly accuse USA because they do not have a proof – there is no isolated virus. And the virus cannot be isolated because the development of such thing was not successful so far. As Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg testifies, this ‘vaccine’ is actually a development of a virus. If you live long enough, you will know Big Pharma have finished development when they file a patent for the virus. That is, if someone does not stop them in the meantime.

All you have to do is to watch this 20-minute video and read the military documents. The evidence are clear.

Sort:  

I did read the document, and did watch the video. And the "evidence," if you want to call it that, is far from clear. I see a lot of mutually contradictory "trust me, bro" type assurances with text CLAIMING to have been lifted from intelligence community sources.

I want to thank you for pointing out the bit about EcoHealth Alliance "first" proposing the idea in 2018 though, because that proves this is inaccurate. Documents from as far back as 2014, showing both American and Vietnamese (Not sure why) funding for the same project at WIV, have been public since February 2020.

Now having said that, your explanation of "The Chinese couldn't accuse the Americans without admitting guilt themselves" does make perfect sense. Everything else here though, is more than a bit sus.

And the "evidence," if you want to call it that, is far from clear. I see a lot of mutually contradictory "trust me, bro" type assurances with text CLAIMING to have been lifted from intelligence community sources.

That is a report to the Inspector General of the Ministry of Defense, @patriamreminisci. Nobody from the U.S. Army did not came out and said that it is fake. It is not relevant what do you or I see in it. The important question is: can this report be used in the Court of Law or not?