You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Downvotes & Reward Policing: Abuse of Power or Good for the Platform?

in Deep Dives3 years ago

ALGORAND.

if something gets flagged, then an alert goes to a RANDOM SAMPLE of 100 accounts. If an account fails to respond in 24 hours, their option is forfeit and their option goes to another random account.

60 of these delegates vote on whether to remove the flagged content (in exchange for some compensation in ALGORAND) with a bonus for voting with the majority (if there is a majority of at least 60 votes).

if there's a 59/41 split,the content remains unaffected.

Sort:  

I just dont know all this technical stuff at all, I had no idea flagging worked like this, I been on this platform since 2018 and I never got an alert like tht

Forgive me but I have no idea what your talking about

this is an ALTERNATIVE proposal.

currently, the rich HIVE accounts (OLIGARCHY) get to downvote whatever they want.

a much more fair system would be a RANDOMIZED CONSENSUS protocol (LIKE ALGORAND).

ooooh, bro I love it