It really is a maturity and compliance test. There is ample opportunity to learn to not trust self-appointed authorities and there has been for many decades now - now it's simply coming to a head. No more weasling around taking a stance on these issues we are presented with and many simply go with the latest fad marketed as science fact when it is anything but scientific.
There are countless holes in the virus and cony logic, yet people can be convinced they "have" something despite not showing any of the signs those same authorities claim accompany that contraction. It's a fiction, plain and simple. And as such I see no reason to get worried or hung up on following an idea and its alleged ramifications when I can clearly see it as nothing more than a modern day fairytale.
I feel much of the fear-mongering is all about convincing those who doubt the official story to still somehow give in to the "measures" dictated by those who dreamt it up. Let's not. Those who are ready to see through it will say NO. Those who believe anything they hear in the mainstream on the other hand might really need this test as a dramatic manifestation of their own inability to anylze and judge life and facts for themselves.
Blessings!
Civilisations that have been bombarded by media with bad news for some 50+ years now, and at the same time immersed in comfort from any real dangers due to material prosperity, are people who are fearful of almost anything that might threaten their comfort emptied of culture, as that is all they have left. Fear of disease and catastrophes that might occur prevents the human spirit from resting and mass phenomena from happening that probably would not occur without the media global cacophony of the eternally imminent end of the world. But who knows, maybe people have always tended to believe in doom and miss out on trusting each other about it and realising that reality in the mind is not the same as reality outside the mental imagination? How else can it be explained that people give themselves up to fighting each other, although these very people depend on each other in their daily existence?
And even the brightest minds seemed unable to resist the fearful fantasies when they spoke of world problems, when the world is far too big and incomprehensible to "solve its problems". At the same time, we may very well overlook the kindness and less spectacular displays of trust that take place, don't we? One's own loving, affectionate and responsible nature is always there, always has great potential, as long as one does not try to prevent it from expressing itself through explicit morality. But where morality is explicitly imposed, ethics cannot unfold implicitly.
Greetings to you. <3