In case you missed it, the inventor of mRNA vaccine technology and RNA transfection came out to issue a warning of the risks of mRNA vaccines. Dr. Malone posted a warning of the risks on linkedin, which was subsequently censored due it his message not conforming to the religio-cult of the mainstream narrative.
His bio speaks of his credentials and expertise in being a source of credible statement regarding the mRNA technology:
The inventor of mRNA vaccines and RNA transfection, Dr. Malone has extensive research and development experience in the areas of pre-clinical discovery research, clinical trials, vaccines, gene therapy, bio-defense, and immunology. He has over twenty years of management and leadership experience in academia, pharmaceutical and biotechnology industries, as well as in governmental and non-governmental organizations.
But when you're just a mindless robot for a censorship agenda, you just censor, delete and ban things that don't fit the false box of reality you are supposd to enforce.
After threatening to leave linkedin, his message was reinstated. It reads:
Regarding dosing of the COVID genetic vaccines (mRNA, recombinant adenovirus) versus the more traditional vaccines (including Novavax). There are some inconvenient truths here.
First, the current genetic vaccines (Sanofi, J&J, Pfizer, Moderna) did not undergo the time tested assessments of dose ranging and dose timing clinical studies, to the best of my knowledge. I have direct first person report of how the dose was selected for Moderna (confidential source), and it was basically a SWAG by committee consensus. Personally, for what it is worth, it is my opinion that the current mRNA vaccines selected a dose that was too high, too far up on the sigmoidal dose response curve - so that we may have excess adverse events. Dose selection with vaccines is usually about careful balancing of adverse events with potency/efficacy/effectiveness, with a bias towards safety.
(Correction, proper dose ranging was done for Pfizer, limited sample size)
Second big inconvenient truth is that the spike protein is the actual active agent, in terms of eliciting an immune response. And in the case of the traditional vaccines, the dose of spike protein is defined relatively precisely. With the genetic vaccines, it is not (to the best of my knowledge). I know of no data wherein the mean, median, range etc of total amount of spike protein produced in a patient after administration of the COVID genetic vaccine has been defined. Usually, the FDA is quite persnickety about such things, but I am not aware of this key variable having been determined. Therefore, the range and severety of adverse events potentially attributable to the level of expressed spike protein may reflect patient to patient differences in genetic transfer efficiency and subsequent spike expression. #Science #Data #honestyisthebestpolicy #Transparency #evidencebasedmedicine
It's clear that there is an agenda to supress sicentific inquiry, allowing expoerst to speak, questioning the dogmatic official narrative, and of suppressing science itself. This is an organized coordinated effort. One may dare to call that an open conspiracy to deceive the public, and they wouldn't be wrong. Meanwhile, media and govenrment are busy trying to convince the public that they are not deceiving anyone, and that all these people being censored are the deceivers spreading "medical misinformation".
All the agencies meant to ensure safety and help keep big pharma in line are failing and have been failing for decades. They are captured and gatekeepers for pushing medical products, amny of which have grave safety issues for those who take them.
*EDIT: Changed title to technology rather than vaccine, as that's a semantically more accurate statement, Malone invented mRNA tech that led to current mRNA vax. He's the "grandfather" of the vax tech that led to its development.
Yeah he is being censored all over. Im sure google tagged him as fake news. I dont have the link for that story though.
mRNA vaccines were invented 20 years after Malone stopped working in mRNA research. Under no established definition could he be considered the inventor of mRNA vaccines.
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/history-how-mrna-vaccines-were-discovered-jill-glasspool-malone-phd
I have already seen this particular claim, it is difficult to miss when so prominently placed on his web site. But as a factual matter, none of that qualifies him to be the inventor of mRNA vaccines, which were reduced to practice 20 years later. And his wife should know that. But just possibly, someone's wife isn't the most unbiased person when it comes to judging their scientific achievements.
I haven't taken the time to read or watch anything he has put out but regardless if he is or isn't that wouldn't necessarily mean he doesn't know what he's trying to express in regard to the technology, especially in regards to this point:
He isn't the only one who has brought this up as a concern.
It is easy to ask questions that are hard to answer, as he apparently is doing here. But the real world data isn't showing a lot of adverse events from the vaccine. And that is the heart of the issue, not whether they have measured spike production levels in different patients, but how many are suffering adverse events.
In fact, my recollection is that Malone himself is not recommending against adults taking the vaccine. He primarily argued against giving it to children, based on the idea that children had less bad effects from the virus itself, so he argued that the risk-benefit analysis wasn't worth it. That's still a flawed analysis, IMO, because he wasn't arguing with hard data, just a concern about unknowns, and he also ignored the potential benefits of reaching herd immunity thru vaccination. Not only direct health benefits to children (decreased chance to contract covid for all children including ones that are immunocompromised), but economic ones as well (better economy to live in, still living parents with jobs, etc).
If the risks of covid were less severe, such arguments could be made more reasonably, but when we look at the impacts, and the increasing danger of delta (and possibly worse variants), this isn't a complicated calculation.
There's never going to be any reaching herd immunity with covid through vaccination. The vaccines do not keep someone from getting covid. The vaccinated can also spread covid. The reason they can't mandate the vaccine is because they have to prove their is nothing else available to treat it and there has been since the beginning, study after study has proven hydroxychloroquine not only treats covid illness but also acts as a prophylactic, so does ivermectin. These are safe proven drugs, the vaccines are not, just as one example out of thousands here's a woman who just had her legs and hands amputated because her employer mandated she get a vaccine. She got the vaccine then caught covid, per one article on it: