Woman treated like criminal for not wearing mask after mandate lifted

in Deep Dives3 years ago (edited)

It's been a nasty year for people who care about freedom and sane rational thinking about reality and real data. The scamdemic has pushed forward and continues to stay inculcated into the minds of the masses as a real threat when it's akin to the flu, with fraudulent PCR tests used to diagnose a disease, unlawful mandates to force people to submit to authority and so much more.

A recent case of a woman not wearing a mask the day after the unlawful mask mandate was lifted from the state of Texas, shows how much the fascist creep is continuing. Even after the authoritarian state says you don't need to do what we command you do, the private sector assumes to role of the authoritarian to force you to do things, or be arrested and treated like a criminal.

Here is the video of the incident of a 65 year old woman arrested for trying to get her money out of the bank and close her account:

She is a threat to the public?

After she tries to leave when the fascist trash cop grabs her, he pursues her for originally disobeying him and seeks to further punish her with arrest when she is actually leaving after being grabbed against her will by a piece of trash.

She described her experience in an interview:

This is the world. The love and support of authoritarianism and tyranny.

Sort:  

Problem is that the mandate was lifted but businesses were left with the option if they wanted to require mask or not. She should have just put on the mask one final time, took her money out and went and deposited it in a bank that wasn't requiring people still use mask. It really was that simply but she had to make it hard on herself.

Now you want to see a story of injustice not left to a momentary act of stupidity take a look at his lady.
https://www.mlive.com/news/grand-rapids/2021/03/supporters-of-jailed-michigan-woman-board-up-her-restaurant-hoping-to-earn-her-release.html

Here's an article with a video interview she did on Tucker Carlson, she's standing up for the big picture involved here. She's from Poland and knows what tyranny looks like. She made a decision that shutting down wasn't the right choice to maintain her livelihood and chose not to enforce the mask mandates....but that was her choice, if she had chosen to require mask that also would have been her choice because ultimately it's her business and no one else but herself should make that determination for her. I seen another video from Canada where the owner(s), employees took down a man and held him until the police arrived....but you see it was not this man's choice to decide against what the owners chose...it was his choice to go elsewhere. These people are owners, they are invested in their businesses and it's their sole choice to determine what avenue's they want to follow
https://news.yahoo.com/tucker-carlson-tonight-guest-arrested-010856530.html

In some cases, yes, if you want to receive the service or product, you can choose to accept the terms of service or move on. But the bank changed the rules after the service was provided (she already had an account), and the woman wanted to no longer have that service anymore due to the change in rules. She never agreed to the service which obliged her to wear a mask, she didn't agree to that rule to get the service, they changed it on her. They must abide by the service they provided prior to their rule change that she didn't agree to in exchange for the service they offered at the time.

Nice try but no cheesecake for you.