I pointed that out earlier how heavily Gaza was dependent upon humanitarian aid. Ukraine's government was the same, heavily dependent upon aid. Billions upon billions going out of world government coffers to sustain that population/government. Same similarly is what you brought up about "limited operations", I don't know where you seen that at, not sure you mentioned it, but it rings right along with Putin's "special operations". I made a comment as to why he keeps referring to them as that and someone said it was because they couldn't use the military in these operations only individuals conscripted into the Ukraine operation, the regular military, they argued, had to protect the homeland. Which would seem to make some sense I guess up until I heard Zalensky refer to the operations in Ukraine a couple weeks ago as "special operations".
They know the whole baby reports would be beyond reproach, and it is shown as such when brought up in any form of doubt and those individuals labeled as supporting baby killers. I know for myself I questioned the reality of it after they said they invited reporters in to verify it and they were women. Who on earth lets women see something of that nature, think of the nightmares. I am just not convinced any woman could handle seeing that. Maybe it's the messaging behind relating of mother to child. I don't know. These women though came out and said they saw images of babies, who would describe being brought into a building as having seen images and not babies or children in the description of it. One thought I did have was if this was scripted could these be aborted full term babies. I am not doubting the barbarity of some who roam among us on this earth but I also have no doubts about the false narratives that we've seen before. Genocide can only be accepted by the atrocities committed. That would be why it's never been allowed on a historical basis of religious animosity.
I really believe that this incident has become a wake up call because of the way it went down, people can't wrap their heads around this one and that's why for the first time I think we see an overwhelming response of skepticism.
Personally, and I know you don't particularly like it when I go there but the fact that Hezbollah hasn't jumped into a prime opportunity that was evidently afforded Hamas somehow, I think that goes back to Trump having called them "very smart", meaning in my opinion they opted for the money (bribe) over a prime opportunity. Did you know that also in July the US sent a ship to the middle east whose specialty is in evacuations. Sounds like a pre-planning prep to me, after all history has shown you can't put a one hundred percent trust behind some of those groups in the ME, if Hezbollah would have opted to hop into the fray that ship would have been needed.
About the limited operations - its just really shows how biased that western media is - which I guess you would expect them to be. They will expect what is happening - fully support - but only if Russia is not doing it. About the dead babies - I don't know if it happened, of course, but it looks like propaganda - it was the quickest way to invoke a reaction I think in the west - something easy to understand - I think in time it will be called the same as the incubator / Iraq / Kuwait hoax - but time will tell. It is hard to see what is happening because there is so much propaganda - and it will take a long time to figure it out, meanwhile it keeps on flooding through - there is limited ability to figure it out I mean given the scale of it, being a war and not around a single event. About "pre-planning" yes, I agree - but its of course easier to see in hindsight with these things - I did not know that about the ship - but no doubt, this would have taken a lot of planning - including most likely the new waves of censorship just beforehand.
Thanks!