I said this after having viewed Kennedy's interview with Tucker Carlson, that being it could have been in the cards to bring Kennedy into the race to try and instill confidence back into the government health agencies after the roll out of the vaccines. The reason I said it was because during that interview Kennedy's posture had changed. The first part he was definitely off his game. Almost as in he was being scripted in what he was saying. The second part of the video, where he appears to be in his own skin again, he talks off the top of his head. That led me to change my opinion of him as I knew something wasn't quite right with that. You take a man who can talk off the top of his head, knows his game, knows what he wants to say but all of a sudden you see him off his game it's a clear signal something had changed. That's when I suspected he was brought in, he didn't choose to run on his own, he was prompted to run in case things went south with the vaccines. That's exactly what they would have needed to do and I think they planned for such an event. Personally I think they've been lying all along about the amount of support he'd been getting, not sure it was at a point of winning but someone was obviously taking a huge chunk of support away from the parties. It's becoming a bit more obvious now because, as I said on another site, you have to listen to the phrase most commonly spoken when something transpires. When Kennedy announced he'd be quitting the race and backing Trump because he'd hurt Trump more in the battleground states than Harris, that's what all the news orgs started parroting. A few days later it comes out that Kennedy made moves to have himself removed from the ballot in ten states, those ten states included the battleground states, but in other states outside those ten states he wanted to remain on the ballot and was encouraging people to still vote for him in those states. That's why I said I think they were lying about the amount of support he was getting. Because it appears that people have forgotten how Trump won the 2016 election, it was because of all those other states, it was clearly noted that Hillary bypassed those states and it was even pointed out by her husband Bill. That's how Trump managed to come up from behind on Hillary. There's just no way Trump would be out there acknowledging that Kennedy is joining his team because he'd take more votes away from him than Kamala in the battleground states but let him openly state he doesn't want off the ballot in all those other states Trump won and wants people to still vote for him there. That just doesn't add up. As in stands in that regard, it almost makes it sound like they are trying to throw this election to Harris. People need to face it, since Trump we've lost the battleground states basically. Because of Trump's crazy candidates here in Michigan during the midterms, it historically turned the senate and house blue. We lost the red wave totally. If Trump was struggling in the battleground states, I don't think taking Kennedy off the ballot is going to be much help. To allow him to stay on the ballots in the other states that were crucial to his win in 2016 is really asinine. For Lady Shenanigan, which I call her, to die her hair, put it in what appears pigtails, make her look like she's auditioning for a remake version of Hee Haw, well, that's how Trump plays, making republicans look stupid again. The mix that don't match is Kennedy having told everyone he'd pull the covid vaccine if he won, exactly how is that going to work out when Trump doesn't let anybody talk bad about his big, beautiful vaccine. It's not. The fact Trump came out a few weeks ago and promised he was going to get to the truth of why so many people are suddenly falling ill, well, that was a bridge to far. So what's he saying, he's bringing Kennedy aboard, offering him a job at the FDA so Americans will feel well again. That's exactly how it appears and making them feel well again won't have anything to do with removing the vaccine as Ms Shenanigan's interview proves along with a statement Kennedy released the last month where he said "Brave dissent doctors like Pierre Korry can help clear away the smoke screen of corporate profiteering so that we can see clearly the causes and solutions to the chronic disease epidemic." (July 8, 2024) It's sort of obvious that the ill effects from, and the deaths from the vaccines aren't going to be on that list of chronic things and will focus on, like in a video where I got the quote from, Jimmy Dore, highlighting that cholesterol, in a new study, is formed along the artery walls deposited there by cholesterol carrying cells as a patch to heal an injury to the wall. Dore was going on about all this time they said it was saturated fats and not a natural process the body goes through and that big pharma giving people these satins were doing more harm than good, that on average, the study found, that taking satins may prolong people's lives by two, three days but the satins have worse side effects and are more detrimental to people's health but they keep pushing them because big pharma profits immensely off them. He also kept point out that it was actually sugar as the culprit. It really wasn't adding up much if you ask me, no matter where or why the cholesterol builds up on the artery walls, it's still there. How could sugar be the culprit if it's a natural bodily process, he didn't provide proof about the sugar outside of two people who famously disagreed on what caused it. I agree about the satins but there was one moment I though I seen an expression on his face where he even momentarily thought, am I making any sense here. You see what I am trying to say, he even shows a video of how the natural process works, that's the moment I thought I seen him doubt himself, because, the reality is, no matter the process it got there, it's still there. A cholesterol producing cell comes along and splats some cholesterol on the injury like a band aid that doesn't come off. Satins are probably the worse solution, but the fact remains, it's clearly demonstrated in his video. lol. I think that moving forward we're going to see a lot of stuff like this coming out, "you aren't sick because of a vaccine, you are sick because blah, blah, blah medicine you are on." It's all big pharma's fault but you watch they won't fault big pharma for the vaccine. I am just saying, we can't lose sight of this switch up and what they are trying to do, deflect blame away from the vaccine. Now we know why Kennedy was brought into the fold, they figure they'll get the truth from him, which they probably will, and people will trust him on that, but it won't be the whole truth of the matter. After that Tucker interview I just knew a canary in the coal mine was going to appear. It has finally arrived. No matter who people vote for, we are just plain screwed at this point, which I am not voting this go around anyway, I count it as a useless endeavor. Though I feel Trump set up the ducks in a row, Harris has no problem killing them.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
About Kennedy - you might be right of course, that he was prompted to run, etc., and that the media downplayed his influence - maybe there was a piped piper strat - he would have most likely taken votes from both sides, I am not sure which more - I do think he is an honest person though - I have looked at his body language for a while now - and he comes across as honest - I do agree with him on all the major issue facing not only humanity but the world right now - of course, there are a number I don't - I don't think he wanted to endorse Trump -as VC said in an old post a few days ago - you could see it on his face when he came on stage, he was not happy to be there - I figure his thinking was that he could do a lot if he got into gov, and oversaw things - which is what we are being told he will be doing.
About the battleground states - yeah, I have heard the same thing. I just don't know enough about it to really say. But that is what a lot of people are saying - I think its all perception though, and has little to do with voting at all at this point - you just need the war for perception -but that is just my opinion.
Thanks!
I agree he comes off honest, when he's in his own game. VC too has gotten the impression of a moment he didn't feel he was in his game when he came onstage. I don't think people find any candidate they are in total agreement with, whether you agree or disagree with things he says, you can tell he is talking from his gut feelings on things. I'd say heart but really, joining the Trump bandwagon was a bridge to far for a man who said he'd do something about the vaccine. That's never going to happen now, Trump won't allow it.