One could really think that but the objective is to create new industries via the green energy transformation. Along with creating new industries, new technologies doesn't fall far behind. For example, like Larry Fink said, getting rid of carbon doesn't mean it won't be used, the transition is based on everyone changing to a cleaner fuel source. So the US transitions to electric and Europe, China and other Asian countries transition to natural gas. New technologies include AI, but it also includes the expansion of social media networks in the middle east that will spring forth to influence their youths with the SA equivalents of Zuckerburg and Musk.
This goes to what Kushner described in his interviews using Zuckerburg and Musk as examples, and what he said about them having gone over the history of the last seventy five years to see what works and what didn't work. The industrial revolution worked, they want to do the same with energy and technology. Like also what Trump was once quoted as saying, making money off investments doesn't come by investing in the old, it's by investing in the new, or something very similar to that.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Create new industries in the atmosphere of a civil and global war, with the absolutely clueless Zionist puppet at the top? With destroyed education and with heavy lagging in key technologies?
Are you high on hopium, @sunlit7?
You can't rebuild without destroying what's there. They did assessments, ran trials, picked different architectural designs, and decided which could be transitioned into green energy efficiencies, and those that couldn't. With Ukraine, they decided much of the infrastructure was to old, and ownership issues would be to complicated to track having gone from multiple different owners. Germany has built an industry based on new green technologies, which is why they are in Russian occupied areas of Ukraine, providing services to them to rebuild. All you have to do is read the global partnership agreements and their agreements of mutual understanding to find this all out. If they went to people and said it would be too cost prohibitive to transition all your housing into energy efficiency so we are going to relocate everybody and tear down entire sections of cities, one, people would be outraged, two, it would be time consuming holding meetings and getting input, three, it would be cost prohibitive to do it that way. The better way is like what they are doing in Ukraine and Gaza, just bomb the hell out of it.
One other thing, they called them models, (which they transitioned), and they picked from different places across the globe.