Last night I watched this movie called Richard Jewell - it is about a security guard who found a pipebomb, and then what happens is the FBI try to frame him as the bomber - even though they know he was not the one that made the "phone call" i.e., that made the bomb threat before it blew up - it was a good complement to the info about the pipe-bomb - its all ether cover up, or go after innocent people. What up side, is unlike the 1990s, the narritives that are being pup out now by governments fall apart so fast because of the speed of the internet - holes are found pretty fast.
I agree 100% about banking. And the furthest away from them you can get is the best. You sound like you have a good plan.
About Helium - yeah I can't figure out the play there - I am sure as the months pass there will be something that will make all the puzzle pieces fit together - other than just corruption.
About the statues being toppled over - that is true, in fact, no one cares what statue is toppled over it would seem, as long as there is a small crowd around it when it is being done. The problem is - if you are a lone toppler - then you get changed.
Thanks!
I agree with you on all points, however they're irrelevant to my reasoning. What I was trying to do was highlight the main difference, his intention of hurting the statue's owner for his perceived religion, through destruction of his property. Now, it's only hearsay until the evidence is presented, for we all know cops will often interpret an individuals words completely incorrectly. Regarding your and the previous commenter's point about the leftist mob's crimes, they destroyed statues of presidents and war heroes, etc. One can argue George Washington and Robert E. Lee were godlike figures, but the criminal intent was never related to religion. Also, I am pretty sure no individual ever confessed to damaging a statue for religious reasons, as was done in this case.
Sorry, I did not think you were talking to me, thought you were talking to VC above - yes, I agree with you destruction of private property is destruction - however, to clarify my comments - the main thing is that this is being label as a hate crime is the problem I have - I don't think its a hate crime personally because you are not dealing with a real religion - the Church of Satan are self confessed atheists / activists - so the hate is for the ideology not the person - for instance, would it be a hate crime if you pulled down a SJW sign that was somewhere - that is how I measure it though. Anyway, good points! PS: I believe no crime should be a hate crime etc.., I think everything should be judged on the crime that was inflected and everyone should receive the same punishment. Of course, justice is largely fake, so it does not matter really these days.
Thanks!