"...she would be neglecting the always tense internal insecurity situation. The mobilized troops will be stationed in areas with high levels of irregular migratory movements, arms and drug trafficking."
I think this statement self-contradictory. The mobilization of troops in the specified areas directly attacks the internal insecurity by imposing barriers to the production of financial profits by the cartels, and that is their source of power. As the USA eliminates the funding training, arming, and supplying cartels by the covert arms of the USG, acting against the relic forces in Mexico will spit roast the cartels and increasingly reduce their inimical power over the Mexican people, migrants, and the American polity as well.
"...most U.S. foreign assistance funds ”are used to fuel dissent, fund protests and undermine administrations that refuse to align with the globalist agenda.”
I do not disagree with Bukele. However, I doubt the current administration will replace USAID with anything that doesn't do this. CIA cutouts will always do evil, because that's what cutouts are for, and any replacement of USAID will do the same crap. It is obvious to me that acting at such political levels will always enable contraverting the interests of affected populations. Only direct interactions of affected populations will not. To prevent being parasitized by oligarchies people themselves need to effect their policies with their economic assets, not delegate them to parasites with government titles.
Sovereigns rule. Subjects are ruled. Empowering officials subjugates populations.
"...totally unrelated to its food and medicine distribution network."
Unfortunately, that is not the fact. It is the power of such institutions as USAID and NED that the harm done polities and communities through such aid is facilitated covertly in those institutional mechanisms. The personnel distributing aid are secretly hired because of their political malleability and then trained in spreading dissent, promoting demonstrations that can be used to impose riots, and ultimately to create color revolutions. That is the intention of all funds availed USAID and NED, and similar Western NGOs, like Save the Children, that Jill Biden is involved in. In every case these institutions are proclaimed as salvation but are perverted secretly to be damnation.
"...the essential functions of USAID in the operational routines of the State Department..."
Regardless of the institutional structure, the covert machinations of oligarchs to harm Cuba will remain as they have been. Zero trust can be given to overt claims because the interests of oligarchies haven't changed, so their perversion of institutions will continue to be predatory. Only direct interaction between ad hoc civilian organizations, rather than governmental institutions, is actually revolutionary and independent of oligarchical usurpation. Institutionalization is the enabling mechanism that allows perversion to covertly corrupt beneficial political action. As long as civilians themselves interact to mutually benefit each the other, they cannot be infiltrated and betrayed to instead parasitize economic activity.
You will not see governments seeking to implement such ad hoc and civilian networking and interactions, because such economic beneficence is not the purpose of corrupt oligarchs that profit from governing cash cattle, whether in Cuba or the US. Economic beneficence can only be grass roots networking between populations across boundaries where both populations can benefit each other by forthright communications and endeavors in economic development using their own assets for the purpose. Wherever taxes are involved, parasitic oligarchs are feasting.
You are presumably an example of ad hoc civilian outreach exactly as I state is necessary. We talk to one another, and our economic interactions deliver directly our political intention to mutually benefit our people though our personal actions. Were we coordinating further trade and commerce by our connection here, we could increase our impact and beneficence to our communities. I am a market for Cuban cigars, and have supplies of currencies beneficial to Cuban producers, for example. Were we to effect commerce via necessary mechanisms to avoid interference, our people could directly benefit from that commerce, negating the oligarchies hell bent on their own aggrandizement of any economic interactions of our peoples.
Thanks!