Claimed. Passing on information with nothing to back it up is reckless. What are you referencing? The "Dr" had zero evidence and could not reproduce his results. His name was Hoffe and his letter was thoroughly debunked suggesting that mRNA vaccines are actually a form of "experimental gene modification therapy."
https://www.cbc.ca/news/health/covid-19-vaccine-clinical-trial-questions-answers-1.5838512
One other thing, I did find his percentage to be alarming but I am not a medical doctor or any medical professional. I did not dismiss what he said out of hand because the people he treated most often were from a Canadian Indian Tribe, it isn't out of the realm of reality that this vaccine or any vaccine can have a differing effect upon certain nationalities.
Esh, yes, socioeconomic differences do play a part in health care disparities especially when dealing with indigenous populations. But race is a crude proxy and falls short of huge variations in responses to medication. However, if there is clinical data to back it up we should absolutely look into it. But there isn't. mRNA vaccines are not a form of "experimental gene modification therapy and S proteins are not an unsafe toxin.
Any medical professional no matter how credentialed they are are debunked, fact checked and labeled whackos. I highly doubt he'd testify on the record for the people collecting data for a case in the world tribunal court wouldn't have his records to back up what he said. So we shall see when that day unfolds.
But that's not the case here... that's good. He was fact-checked, and could not produce the data to back up his claims. At that point, he's no different than you or I claiming something as a fact that actually has contradicting data and research.