Sort:  

Pseudoscience ubiquitously neglects the core principle of the scientific method, which is disprovability. Claims which aren't testable, that cannot be subjected to tests potential of disproving them, aren't science.

Thanks!

It is certainly always good to debunk people who use faked scientific jargon to sell remedies that have not even a chance or shred of real evidence or research behind them. Such stuff is basically just quackery, lies, and theft- and its right to be pissed at that stuff.

Nevertheless I can't help but feel that such attitudes also run the danger of lumping in good faith people who are exploring the metaphysical nature of reality, want to have a more in depth, scientific understanding of the universe, etc. The simple fact is that people who believe in a pure material, newtonian physics based universe are limiting themselves to a fiction because classic physics is familiar and safe. It has the vibe of being the attitude of down to earth, pragmatic serious people- even while already having been debunked some time ago - which makes it more of a preferred cultural narrative than something that reflects a serious commitment to science and reality. Truth, it turns out, is stranger than fiction.

The simple fact is that the quantum view is the most scientifically validated approach to metaphysics we know of.

Congratulations @zyx066! You have completed the following achievement on the Hive blockchain and have been rewarded with new badge(s):

You have been a buzzy bee and published a post every day of the week.

You can view your badges on your board and compare yourself to others in the Ranking
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word STOP

Check out the last post from @hivebuzz:

Hive Power Up Month - Feedback from April day 6
NFT for Peace - Feedback and new city
Support the HiveBuzz project. Vote for our proposal!

Your article is a prime example of the horrors of pseudoscience and delusion.

Ironically you believe that something coming from nothing (immaculate conception) is science when it comes straight from the Roman Catholic doctrines!

What are your standards of believing if something is objectively true or not?
Watching it on TV?
It certainly seems so.