Yes, we will have to politely disagree here. I'll refer you to the responses given by @altleft and add some facts that are available for all to see: 1) vaccinations have existed since the late 18th century when people were injected with the relatively mild cowpox virus as protection against smallpox, 2) covid-19 is not a hoax, we all have someone in our circle of family, relatives and friends who's gotten it, my wife and mother-in-law for example, 3) variations almost ALWAYS arise with viruses as relatively simple organisms adapt relatively quickly, like the flu for example, of which we have a new variation almost every year, 4) although big pharma has every capitalist incentive to exaggerate the negative effects of ANY disease, that doesn't mean all diseases are fake, this should be obvious, and 5) we've all, or almost all been vaccinated as kids and if our parents had exhibited the same irrational panic and fear of vaccinations we see now, maybe you and I wouldn't be having this conversation.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
The 18th century was not very much different from ours in terms of having scientists compete against each other in their ambitions to make a difference in this world. You can count on the very fact, that those scientists, which promised the bigger market won the competition. Robert Koch had relations to the King and politicians at his time. When he made experiments with the soldiers of the army and caused too much damage on his "volunteers", he was said to stop those experiments. Which he did, only to continue them in Africa (if I remember correctly).
Every form of disease could be deadly, yet isn't deadly, once you let the disease happen. But if you wish it not to happen, you'll never know if you'd survive or die by it. In the same way, you have no knowledge about whether people survived through vaccines or if they survived by not having had them. If you vaccinate 95 percent or 100 percent humans, there is no chance to prove that it worked, for you don't know if those who did not receive vaccination, would have lived despite not having it.
I did not buy the claims of todays scientists of a highly deadly disease. Human vanity, greed and anxiety plays a huge role within the sciences, so it's excluded from their realm of publishing and language used. While it remains a part of their thinking and feeling.
Usually I stop in front of a red light. But the thing is, I would stop whether there is a red light or not, when the streets were busy. If it's unclear which rule is given, I behave as I see the actual situation needs it.
I ignored red lights a couple of times in my life. It was during night, no traffic whatsoever, quiet streets, no pedestrians or other vehicles on the road. I felt like an idiot to wait until it was green and so I violated this rule.
If you are truly interested in those sources where the virus theory is handled differently, I might direct you to Tracy, who runs a blog where the theory is being questioned: @active-truth is her username. I myself read german papers, even from the Max-Planck-Institute, a paper from the end of the 90s, where it was summarized that it neither could be proven nor unproven, and remains uncertain.
I admire science, if it's not dogmatized.